Dating the Manuscript of De Jure Praedae (1604-1608)

What Watermarks, Foliation and Quire Divisions can tell us about Hugo Grotius' Development as a Natural Rights and Natural Law Theorist

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Following the manuscript's discovery in 1864, scholars have widely assumed that De Jure Praedae (Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty) was written by the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) in the period 1604-1606. Yet the conventional dating fails to consider the materiality of Ms. BPL 917 in Leiden University Library. By analyzing paper supplies, this article throws new light on the date and manner of the manuscript's composition. The watermarks in the paper, the quire divisions and foliation are considered in combination with relevant textual evidence, such as manuscript references to historical events and any allusions to Ms. BPL 917 in Grotius' letters and other archival sources. This approach has yielded unforeseen results. Yes, Grotius wrote out the original text in 1604/05, as a fair copy of a previously existing work. Yet lie did not stop there. Entire folio-pages were crossed out in Ms. BPL 917 and new ones inserted in the following sequence:

    in, or shortly before, January 1607, Grotius deleted f. 63v and 67r and inserted f. 64-66

    between January 1607 and Nov-Dec. 1608, he deleted f. 7v, 19r, 38v, and 43r-v and inserted f. 8-9, 18, and 39-42

    in November-December 1608, he deleted f. 119r-122r and inserted f. 117-118. These revisions were a direct response to the challenges faced by the Dutch East India Company (VOC) in this period. Its growing empire in Southeast Asia was under threat from the peace and truce negotiations between the States General and Philip III of Spain and Portugal. Grotius' revisions of Ms. BPL 917, along with chapter twelve's appearance as Mare Liberum in April 1609,justified the continuation of Dutch empire-building in the East Indies, the Twelve Years' Truce (1609-1621) notwithstanding. Grotius' rights and contract theories made it perfectly acceptable to conclude a peace or truce in (Western) Europe, yet persist in colonial warfare beyond the Line (i.e. the Tropic of Cancer). In this respect - the (implicit) differentiation between 'the West and the rest' in international relations - Grotius' legacy is still with us today. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-193
    Number of pages69
    JournalHistory of European Ideas
    Volume35
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

    Keywords

    • Hugo Grotius
    • Materiality of Texts
    • De Jure Praedae
    • Dutch East India Company
    • Twelve Years' Truce
    • International Relations

    Cite this

    @article{75eb600d01da458fbc88765076b3b9b1,
    title = "Dating the Manuscript of De Jure Praedae (1604-1608): What Watermarks, Foliation and Quire Divisions can tell us about Hugo Grotius' Development as a Natural Rights and Natural Law Theorist",
    abstract = "Following the manuscript's discovery in 1864, scholars have widely assumed that De Jure Praedae (Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty) was written by the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) in the period 1604-1606. Yet the conventional dating fails to consider the materiality of Ms. BPL 917 in Leiden University Library. By analyzing paper supplies, this article throws new light on the date and manner of the manuscript's composition. The watermarks in the paper, the quire divisions and foliation are considered in combination with relevant textual evidence, such as manuscript references to historical events and any allusions to Ms. BPL 917 in Grotius' letters and other archival sources. This approach has yielded unforeseen results. Yes, Grotius wrote out the original text in 1604/05, as a fair copy of a previously existing work. Yet lie did not stop there. Entire folio-pages were crossed out in Ms. BPL 917 and new ones inserted in the following sequence:in, or shortly before, January 1607, Grotius deleted f. 63v and 67r and inserted f. 64-66between January 1607 and Nov-Dec. 1608, he deleted f. 7v, 19r, 38v, and 43r-v and inserted f. 8-9, 18, and 39-42in November-December 1608, he deleted f. 119r-122r and inserted f. 117-118. These revisions were a direct response to the challenges faced by the Dutch East India Company (VOC) in this period. Its growing empire in Southeast Asia was under threat from the peace and truce negotiations between the States General and Philip III of Spain and Portugal. Grotius' revisions of Ms. BPL 917, along with chapter twelve's appearance as Mare Liberum in April 1609,justified the continuation of Dutch empire-building in the East Indies, the Twelve Years' Truce (1609-1621) notwithstanding. Grotius' rights and contract theories made it perfectly acceptable to conclude a peace or truce in (Western) Europe, yet persist in colonial warfare beyond the Line (i.e. the Tropic of Cancer). In this respect - the (implicit) differentiation between 'the West and the rest' in international relations - Grotius' legacy is still with us today. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
    keywords = "Hugo Grotius, Materiality of Texts, De Jure Praedae, Dutch East India Company, Twelve Years' Truce, International Relations",
    author = "Van-Ittersum, {Martine Julia}",
    year = "2009",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2009.01.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "125--193",
    journal = "History of European Ideas",
    issn = "0191-6599",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Dating the Manuscript of De Jure Praedae (1604-1608)

    T2 - What Watermarks, Foliation and Quire Divisions can tell us about Hugo Grotius' Development as a Natural Rights and Natural Law Theorist

    AU - Van-Ittersum, Martine Julia

    PY - 2009/6

    Y1 - 2009/6

    N2 - Following the manuscript's discovery in 1864, scholars have widely assumed that De Jure Praedae (Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty) was written by the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) in the period 1604-1606. Yet the conventional dating fails to consider the materiality of Ms. BPL 917 in Leiden University Library. By analyzing paper supplies, this article throws new light on the date and manner of the manuscript's composition. The watermarks in the paper, the quire divisions and foliation are considered in combination with relevant textual evidence, such as manuscript references to historical events and any allusions to Ms. BPL 917 in Grotius' letters and other archival sources. This approach has yielded unforeseen results. Yes, Grotius wrote out the original text in 1604/05, as a fair copy of a previously existing work. Yet lie did not stop there. Entire folio-pages were crossed out in Ms. BPL 917 and new ones inserted in the following sequence:in, or shortly before, January 1607, Grotius deleted f. 63v and 67r and inserted f. 64-66between January 1607 and Nov-Dec. 1608, he deleted f. 7v, 19r, 38v, and 43r-v and inserted f. 8-9, 18, and 39-42in November-December 1608, he deleted f. 119r-122r and inserted f. 117-118. These revisions were a direct response to the challenges faced by the Dutch East India Company (VOC) in this period. Its growing empire in Southeast Asia was under threat from the peace and truce negotiations between the States General and Philip III of Spain and Portugal. Grotius' revisions of Ms. BPL 917, along with chapter twelve's appearance as Mare Liberum in April 1609,justified the continuation of Dutch empire-building in the East Indies, the Twelve Years' Truce (1609-1621) notwithstanding. Grotius' rights and contract theories made it perfectly acceptable to conclude a peace or truce in (Western) Europe, yet persist in colonial warfare beyond the Line (i.e. the Tropic of Cancer). In this respect - the (implicit) differentiation between 'the West and the rest' in international relations - Grotius' legacy is still with us today. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    AB - Following the manuscript's discovery in 1864, scholars have widely assumed that De Jure Praedae (Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty) was written by the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) in the period 1604-1606. Yet the conventional dating fails to consider the materiality of Ms. BPL 917 in Leiden University Library. By analyzing paper supplies, this article throws new light on the date and manner of the manuscript's composition. The watermarks in the paper, the quire divisions and foliation are considered in combination with relevant textual evidence, such as manuscript references to historical events and any allusions to Ms. BPL 917 in Grotius' letters and other archival sources. This approach has yielded unforeseen results. Yes, Grotius wrote out the original text in 1604/05, as a fair copy of a previously existing work. Yet lie did not stop there. Entire folio-pages were crossed out in Ms. BPL 917 and new ones inserted in the following sequence:in, or shortly before, January 1607, Grotius deleted f. 63v and 67r and inserted f. 64-66between January 1607 and Nov-Dec. 1608, he deleted f. 7v, 19r, 38v, and 43r-v and inserted f. 8-9, 18, and 39-42in November-December 1608, he deleted f. 119r-122r and inserted f. 117-118. These revisions were a direct response to the challenges faced by the Dutch East India Company (VOC) in this period. Its growing empire in Southeast Asia was under threat from the peace and truce negotiations between the States General and Philip III of Spain and Portugal. Grotius' revisions of Ms. BPL 917, along with chapter twelve's appearance as Mare Liberum in April 1609,justified the continuation of Dutch empire-building in the East Indies, the Twelve Years' Truce (1609-1621) notwithstanding. Grotius' rights and contract theories made it perfectly acceptable to conclude a peace or truce in (Western) Europe, yet persist in colonial warfare beyond the Line (i.e. the Tropic of Cancer). In this respect - the (implicit) differentiation between 'the West and the rest' in international relations - Grotius' legacy is still with us today. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    KW - Hugo Grotius

    KW - Materiality of Texts

    KW - De Jure Praedae

    KW - Dutch East India Company

    KW - Twelve Years' Truce

    KW - International Relations

    U2 - 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2009.01.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2009.01.004

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 125

    EP - 193

    JO - History of European Ideas

    JF - History of European Ideas

    SN - 0191-6599

    IS - 2

    ER -