Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument: Sensemaking, Engagement and Analytics

John Lawrence; Mark Snaith; Barbara Konat; Katarzyna Budzynska; Chris Reed

doi:10.1145/3007210

Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument: Sensemaking, Engagement and Analytics

John Lawrence, Mark Snaith (Lead / Corresponding author), Barbara Konat, Katarzyna Budzynska, Chris Reed

Computing

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

3 Citations (Scopus)

181 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Debating Technologies, a newly emerging strand of research into computational technologies to support human debating, offer a powerful way of providing naturalistic, dialogue-based interaction with complex information spaces. The full potential of debating technologies for dialogical argument can, however, only be realised once key technical and engineering challenges are overcome, viz., data structure, data availability and interoperability between components. Our aim in this paper is to show that The Argument Web, a vision for integrated, reusable, semantically-rich resources connecting views, opinions arguments and debates online, offers a solution to these challenges. Through the use of a running example taken from the domain of Citizen Dialogue, we demonstrate for the first time that different Argument Web components focusing on sensemaking, engagement and analytics can work in concert as a suite of debating technologies for rich, complex, dialogical argument.

Original language	English
Article number	24
Pages (from-to)	1-23
Number of pages	23
Journal	ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
Volume	17
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/3007210
Publication status	Published - 14 Jul 2017

Keywords

Debating Technology
Argument
Argumentation
Dialogue
Sensemaking
Engagement
Analytics

Access to Document

10.1145/3007210Licence: CC BY

Final published version
2017 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Final published version, 2.45 MBLicence: CC BY

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument: Sensemaking, Engagement and Analytics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Profiles

Budzynska, Katarzyna

Science and Engineering Office - Honorary Senior Lecturer

Person: Honorary

Cite this

Lawrence, J., Snaith, M., Konat, B., Budzynska, K., & Reed, C. (2017). Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument: Sensemaking, Engagement and Analytics. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 17(3), 1-23. [24]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3007210

@article{c0e34f5529f5492dbe9644f4507d722a,

title = "Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument: Sensemaking, Engagement and Analytics",

abstract = "Debating Technologies, a newly emerging strand of research into computational technologies to support human debating, offer a powerful way of providing naturalistic, dialogue-based interaction with complex information spaces. The full potential of debating technologies for dialogical argument can, however, only be realised once key technical and engineering challenges are overcome, viz., data structure, data availability and interoperability between components. Our aim in this paper is to show that The Argument Web, a vision for integrated, reusable, semantically-rich resources connecting views, opinions arguments and debates online, offers a solution to these challenges. Through the use of a running example taken from the domain of Citizen Dialogue, we demonstrate for the first time that different Argument Web components focusing on sensemaking, engagement and analytics can work in concert as a suite of debating technologies for rich, complex, dialogical argument.",

keywords = "Debating Technology, Argument, Argumentation, Dialogue, Sensemaking, Engagement, Analytics",

author = "John Lawrence and Mark Snaith and Barbara Konat and Katarzyna Budzynska and Chris Reed",

note = "We would like to acknowledge that the work reported in this paper has been supported in part by EPSRC in the UK under grant EP/N014871/1, in part by the Innovate UK under grant 101777 and in part by the Leverhulme Trust under grant RPG-2013-076.",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1145/3007210",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "1--23",

journal = "ACM Transactions on Internet Technology",

issn = "1533-5399",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument

T2 - Sensemaking, Engagement and Analytics

AU - Lawrence, John

AU - Snaith, Mark

AU - Konat, Barbara

AU - Budzynska, Katarzyna

AU - Reed, Chris

N1 - We would like to acknowledge that the work reported in this paper has been supported in part by EPSRC in the UK under grant EP/N014871/1, in part by the Innovate UK under grant 101777 and in part by the Leverhulme Trust under grant RPG-2013-076.

PY - 2017/7/14

Y1 - 2017/7/14

N2 - Debating Technologies, a newly emerging strand of research into computational technologies to support human debating, offer a powerful way of providing naturalistic, dialogue-based interaction with complex information spaces. The full potential of debating technologies for dialogical argument can, however, only be realised once key technical and engineering challenges are overcome, viz., data structure, data availability and interoperability between components. Our aim in this paper is to show that The Argument Web, a vision for integrated, reusable, semantically-rich resources connecting views, opinions arguments and debates online, offers a solution to these challenges. Through the use of a running example taken from the domain of Citizen Dialogue, we demonstrate for the first time that different Argument Web components focusing on sensemaking, engagement and analytics can work in concert as a suite of debating technologies for rich, complex, dialogical argument.

AB - Debating Technologies, a newly emerging strand of research into computational technologies to support human debating, offer a powerful way of providing naturalistic, dialogue-based interaction with complex information spaces. The full potential of debating technologies for dialogical argument can, however, only be realised once key technical and engineering challenges are overcome, viz., data structure, data availability and interoperability between components. Our aim in this paper is to show that The Argument Web, a vision for integrated, reusable, semantically-rich resources connecting views, opinions arguments and debates online, offers a solution to these challenges. Through the use of a running example taken from the domain of Citizen Dialogue, we demonstrate for the first time that different Argument Web components focusing on sensemaking, engagement and analytics can work in concert as a suite of debating technologies for rich, complex, dialogical argument.

KW - Debating Technology

KW - Argument

KW - Argumentation

KW - Dialogue

KW - Sensemaking

KW - Engagement

KW - Analytics

U2 - 10.1145/3007210

DO - 10.1145/3007210

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

JF - ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

SN - 1533-5399

IS - 3

M1 - 24

ER -