Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes

Eric Abel (Lead / Corresponding author), Nikolaos Fotiadis, Mohammed Miah, Paul S. White

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives/Hypothesis: To describe lens and perspective distortion using new measures that have practical meaning to the surgeon, and to apply these measures to show the extent of optical distortion in rigid endoscopes used in endoscopic sinus surgery. Study Design: Laboratory measurements on rigid endoscopes. Methods: Barrel and perspective distortion were measured in 4-mm diameter 0°, 30°, 45°, and 70° rigid sinus endoscopes. Images of square grids were obtained with the endoscopes aligned in a specially constructed test rig. The terms relative size (RS) and relative distance (RD) were introduced to describe size and distance errors; and the term relative angle (RA) was used for assessing perspective errors. Results: All the endoscopes exhibited similar barrel distortion. RS of the image at the periphery was 52%; RD was 80%. For RA values of 30°, 45°, and 70°, RS values were 77%, 58%, and 32%, respectively. Objects at the edge of the surgical field appear significantly more distant than suggested by their screen position. Perspective distortion occurs, unless RA50°. Barrel distortion of the lens helped to offset the effects of perspective distortion. Conclusion: Optical distortion can be quantified and understood using straightforward definitions. High levels of distortion are common, particularly due to perspective distortion, which is dependent on RA but independent of barrel distortion and the viewing angle of the endoscope.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)561-566
    Number of pages6
    JournalLaryngoscope
    Volume125
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

    Fingerprint

    Endoscopes
    Lenses

    Keywords

    • Barrel distortion
    • Definitions of distortion
    • Depth perception
    • Perspective distortion
    • Rigid endoscopes

    Cite this

    Abel, E., Fotiadis, N., Miah, M., & White, P. S. (2014). Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes. Laryngoscope, 125(3), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24971
    Abel, Eric ; Fotiadis, Nikolaos ; Miah, Mohammed ; White, Paul S. / Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes. In: Laryngoscope. 2014 ; Vol. 125, No. 3. pp. 561-566.
    @article{162fd6241e254913994b53b81b2d1280,
    title = "Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes",
    abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: To describe lens and perspective distortion using new measures that have practical meaning to the surgeon, and to apply these measures to show the extent of optical distortion in rigid endoscopes used in endoscopic sinus surgery. Study Design: Laboratory measurements on rigid endoscopes. Methods: Barrel and perspective distortion were measured in 4-mm diameter 0°, 30°, 45°, and 70° rigid sinus endoscopes. Images of square grids were obtained with the endoscopes aligned in a specially constructed test rig. The terms relative size (RS) and relative distance (RD) were introduced to describe size and distance errors; and the term relative angle (RA) was used for assessing perspective errors. Results: All the endoscopes exhibited similar barrel distortion. RS of the image at the periphery was 52{\%}; RD was 80{\%}. For RA values of 30°, 45°, and 70°, RS values were 77{\%}, 58{\%}, and 32{\%}, respectively. Objects at the edge of the surgical field appear significantly more distant than suggested by their screen position. Perspective distortion occurs, unless RA50°. Barrel distortion of the lens helped to offset the effects of perspective distortion. Conclusion: Optical distortion can be quantified and understood using straightforward definitions. High levels of distortion are common, particularly due to perspective distortion, which is dependent on RA but independent of barrel distortion and the viewing angle of the endoscope.",
    keywords = "Barrel distortion, Definitions of distortion, Depth perception, Perspective distortion, Rigid endoscopes",
    author = "Eric Abel and Nikolaos Fotiadis and Mohammed Miah and White, {Paul S.}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1002/lary.24971",
    language = "English",
    volume = "125",
    pages = "561--566",
    journal = "Laryngoscope",
    issn = "0023-852X",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "3",

    }

    Abel, E, Fotiadis, N, Miah, M & White, PS 2014, 'Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes', Laryngoscope, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 561-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24971

    Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes. / Abel, Eric (Lead / Corresponding author); Fotiadis, Nikolaos; Miah, Mohammed; White, Paul S.

    In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 125, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 561-566.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes

    AU - Abel, Eric

    AU - Fotiadis, Nikolaos

    AU - Miah, Mohammed

    AU - White, Paul S.

    PY - 2014/3

    Y1 - 2014/3

    N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: To describe lens and perspective distortion using new measures that have practical meaning to the surgeon, and to apply these measures to show the extent of optical distortion in rigid endoscopes used in endoscopic sinus surgery. Study Design: Laboratory measurements on rigid endoscopes. Methods: Barrel and perspective distortion were measured in 4-mm diameter 0°, 30°, 45°, and 70° rigid sinus endoscopes. Images of square grids were obtained with the endoscopes aligned in a specially constructed test rig. The terms relative size (RS) and relative distance (RD) were introduced to describe size and distance errors; and the term relative angle (RA) was used for assessing perspective errors. Results: All the endoscopes exhibited similar barrel distortion. RS of the image at the periphery was 52%; RD was 80%. For RA values of 30°, 45°, and 70°, RS values were 77%, 58%, and 32%, respectively. Objects at the edge of the surgical field appear significantly more distant than suggested by their screen position. Perspective distortion occurs, unless RA50°. Barrel distortion of the lens helped to offset the effects of perspective distortion. Conclusion: Optical distortion can be quantified and understood using straightforward definitions. High levels of distortion are common, particularly due to perspective distortion, which is dependent on RA but independent of barrel distortion and the viewing angle of the endoscope.

    AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: To describe lens and perspective distortion using new measures that have practical meaning to the surgeon, and to apply these measures to show the extent of optical distortion in rigid endoscopes used in endoscopic sinus surgery. Study Design: Laboratory measurements on rigid endoscopes. Methods: Barrel and perspective distortion were measured in 4-mm diameter 0°, 30°, 45°, and 70° rigid sinus endoscopes. Images of square grids were obtained with the endoscopes aligned in a specially constructed test rig. The terms relative size (RS) and relative distance (RD) were introduced to describe size and distance errors; and the term relative angle (RA) was used for assessing perspective errors. Results: All the endoscopes exhibited similar barrel distortion. RS of the image at the periphery was 52%; RD was 80%. For RA values of 30°, 45°, and 70°, RS values were 77%, 58%, and 32%, respectively. Objects at the edge of the surgical field appear significantly more distant than suggested by their screen position. Perspective distortion occurs, unless RA50°. Barrel distortion of the lens helped to offset the effects of perspective distortion. Conclusion: Optical distortion can be quantified and understood using straightforward definitions. High levels of distortion are common, particularly due to perspective distortion, which is dependent on RA but independent of barrel distortion and the viewing angle of the endoscope.

    KW - Barrel distortion

    KW - Definitions of distortion

    KW - Depth perception

    KW - Perspective distortion

    KW - Rigid endoscopes

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923378349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/lary.24971

    DO - 10.1002/lary.24971

    M3 - Article

    VL - 125

    SP - 561

    EP - 566

    JO - Laryngoscope

    JF - Laryngoscope

    SN - 0023-852X

    IS - 3

    ER -

    Abel E, Fotiadis N, Miah M, White PS. Defining optical distortion in rigid endoscopes. Laryngoscope. 2014 Mar;125(3):561-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24971