Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience

William Smith

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper develops a theory of civil disobedience informed by a deliberative conception of democracy. In particular, it explores the justification of illegal, public and political acts of protest in constitutional deliberative democracies. Civil disobedience becomes justifiable when processes of public deliberation fail to respect the principles of a deliberative democracy in the following three ways: when deliberation is insufficiently inclusive; when it is manipulated by powerful participants; and when it is insufficiently informed. As a contribution to ongoing processes of public deliberation, civil disobedience should be carried out in a way that respects the principles of deliberative democracy, which entails a commitment to persuasive, non-violent forms of protest.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)353-377
    Number of pages25
    JournalRes Publica
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    civil disobedience
    deliberative democracy
    deliberation
    democracy
    protest
    conception of democracy
    respect
    commitment
    Civil Disobedience
    Democracy
    Deliberation
    Deliberative Democracy
    Disobedience
    Protest
    Public Deliberation

    Keywords

    • Civil disobedience
    • Contestation
    • Deliberative democracy
    • Justification
    • Non-violence

    Cite this

    Smith, William. / Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. In: Res Publica. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 353-377.
    @article{5de4facd2f6847eab51f1ae355793cd7,
    title = "Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience",
    abstract = "This paper develops a theory of civil disobedience informed by a deliberative conception of democracy. In particular, it explores the justification of illegal, public and political acts of protest in constitutional deliberative democracies. Civil disobedience becomes justifiable when processes of public deliberation fail to respect the principles of a deliberative democracy in the following three ways: when deliberation is insufficiently inclusive; when it is manipulated by powerful participants; and when it is insufficiently informed. As a contribution to ongoing processes of public deliberation, civil disobedience should be carried out in a way that respects the principles of deliberative democracy, which entails a commitment to persuasive, non-violent forms of protest.",
    keywords = "Civil disobedience, Contestation, Deliberative democracy, Justification, Non-violence",
    author = "William Smith",
    note = "dc.publisher: Kluwer",
    year = "2004",
    doi = "10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "353--377",
    journal = "Res Publica",
    issn = "1356-4765",
    publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
    number = "4",

    }

    Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. / Smith, William.

    In: Res Publica, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2004, p. 353-377.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience

    AU - Smith, William

    N1 - dc.publisher: Kluwer

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - This paper develops a theory of civil disobedience informed by a deliberative conception of democracy. In particular, it explores the justification of illegal, public and political acts of protest in constitutional deliberative democracies. Civil disobedience becomes justifiable when processes of public deliberation fail to respect the principles of a deliberative democracy in the following three ways: when deliberation is insufficiently inclusive; when it is manipulated by powerful participants; and when it is insufficiently informed. As a contribution to ongoing processes of public deliberation, civil disobedience should be carried out in a way that respects the principles of deliberative democracy, which entails a commitment to persuasive, non-violent forms of protest.

    AB - This paper develops a theory of civil disobedience informed by a deliberative conception of democracy. In particular, it explores the justification of illegal, public and political acts of protest in constitutional deliberative democracies. Civil disobedience becomes justifiable when processes of public deliberation fail to respect the principles of a deliberative democracy in the following three ways: when deliberation is insufficiently inclusive; when it is manipulated by powerful participants; and when it is insufficiently informed. As a contribution to ongoing processes of public deliberation, civil disobedience should be carried out in a way that respects the principles of deliberative democracy, which entails a commitment to persuasive, non-violent forms of protest.

    KW - Civil disobedience

    KW - Contestation

    KW - Deliberative democracy

    KW - Justification

    KW - Non-violence

    U2 - 10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5

    DO - 10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 353

    EP - 377

    JO - Res Publica

    JF - Res Publica

    SN - 1356-4765

    IS - 4

    ER -