Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Detecting Argumentative Fallacies in the Wild: Problems and Limitations of Large Language Models

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

313 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Previous work on the automatic identification of fallacies in natural language text has typically approached the problem in constrained experimental setups that make it difficult to understand the applicability and usefulness of the proposals in the real world. In this paper, we present the first analysis of the limitations that these data-driven approaches could show in real situations. For that purpose, we first create a validation corpus consisting of natural language argumentation schemes. Second, we provide new empirical results to the emerging task of identifying fallacies in natural language text. Third, we analyse the errors observed outside of the testing data domains considering the new validation corpus. Finally, we point out some important limitations observed in our analysis that should be taken into account in future research in this topic. Specifically, if we want to deploy these systems in the Wild.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 10th Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining 2023)
EditorsMilad Alshomary, Chung-Chi Chen, Smaranda Muresan, Joonsuk Park, Julia Romberg
Place of PublicationStroudsburg, PA
PublisherAssociation for Computational Linguistics
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9798891760509
Publication statusPublished - 7 Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting Argumentative Fallacies in the Wild: Problems and Limitations of Large Language Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this