Differences by degree: Evidence of the net financial rates of return to undergraduate study for England and Wales

Ian Walker (Lead / Corresponding author), Yu Zhu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    70 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper provides estimates of the impact of higher education qualifications on the earnings of graduates in the U.K. by subject studied. We use data from the recent U.K. Labour Force Surveys which provide a sufficiently large sample to consider the effects of the subject studied, class of first degree, and postgraduate qualifications. Ordinary Least Squares estimates show high average returns for women that does not differ by subject. For men, we find very large returns for Law, Economics and Management but not for other subjects. Degree class has large effects in all subjects suggesting the possibility of large returns to effort. Postgraduate study has large effects, independently of first degree class.A large rise in tuition fees across all subjects has only a modest impact on relative rates of return suggesting that little substitution across subjects would occur. The strong message that comes out of this research is that even a large rise in tuition fees makes little difference to the quality of the investment - those subjects that offer high returns (LEM for men, and all subjects for women) continue to do so. And those subjects that do not (especially OSSAH for men) will continue to offer poor returns. The effect of fee rises is dwarfed by existing cross subject differences in returns.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1177-1186
    Number of pages10
    JournalEconomics of Education Review
    Volume30
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011

    Keywords

    • College premium
    • I 23
    • I 28
    • Rate of return

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differences by degree: Evidence of the net financial rates of return to undergraduate study for England and Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this