Dimensions of perceived control: a factor analysis of 3 measures and an examination of their relation to activity level and mood in a student and cross-cultural patient sample

Debbie Bonetti, Marie Johnston, Jesus Rodriguez-Marin, Mariangeles Pastor, Maite Martin-Aragon, Eva Doherty, Katherine Sheehan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study investigated whether measures of three perceived control (PC) concepts tapped independent dimensions, were invariant to population characteristics of health and culture, were differentially sensitive to health outcomes, and were discriminable from self-report disability. The Multidimensional Health Locus of Control, Generalized Self-efficacy, and Perceived Health Competence (PHC) Scales were administered to 106 Scottish students and 145 Scottish, Spanish and Irish patients, who also completed versions of the Sickness Impact Profile. Principal Components analyses revealed five factors reflecting scale constructions for students and six factors for patients, as PHC items fell on two factors. Disability items fell on a separate factor from all PC items. Results suggest: (a) PC is multidimensional regardless of health and culture; (b) adequate assessment requires multiple PC measures; and (c) it is meaningful to consider PC as a possible influence on disability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)655-674
    Number of pages20
    JournalPsychology and Health
    Volume16
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • Perceived control
    • Disability
    • Activity level
    • Factor analysis
    • Multidimensional health locus of control scale
    • Generalized self-efficacy scale
    • Perceived health competence scale
    • Cross-cultural
    • Sickness impact profile

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dimensions of perceived control: a factor analysis of 3 measures and an examination of their relation to activity level and mood in a student and cross-cultural patient sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this