Disabled people, medical inadmissibility, and the differential politics of immigration

Robert Wilton (Lead / Corresponding author), Stine Hansen, Edward Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
46 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the impact of medical inadmissibility provisions in Canada’s immigration law on applicants with disabilities. The paper draws on key informant interviews, policy analysis, and Ministry of Immigration data on medical inadmissibility findings. We follow the lead of recent mobilities scholarship to examine how the immigration system is enacted, reproduced, and contested over time. From this perspective, we see that recent court challenges to the statutory provisions have created additional procedural space for applicants to contest findings of inadmissibility. However, the legitimacy of excessive demand as a basis for exclusion remains firmly in place, while recent immigration policy changes signal an intensification of measures to limit the social reproductive costs of immigration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-400
Number of pages12
JournalCanadian Geographer
Volume61
Issue number3
Early online date7 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

immigration
politics
applicant
immigration law
immigration policy
reproductive cost
ministry
policy analysis
disability
legitimacy
exclusion
Canada
demand
costs
interview
time

Keywords

  • disability
  • immigration
  • mobility
  • Canada

Cite this

@article{5b186da2f93f40f084c986deb5ed8422,
title = "Disabled people, medical inadmissibility, and the differential politics of immigration",
abstract = "This paper is concerned with the impact of medical inadmissibility provisions in Canada’s immigration law on applicants with disabilities. The paper draws on key informant interviews, policy analysis, and Ministry of Immigration data on medical inadmissibility findings. We follow the lead of recent mobilities scholarship to examine how the immigration system is enacted, reproduced, and contested over time. From this perspective, we see that recent court challenges to the statutory provisions have created additional procedural space for applicants to contest findings of inadmissibility. However, the legitimacy of excessive demand as a basis for exclusion remains firmly in place, while recent immigration policy changes signal an intensification of measures to limit the social reproductive costs of immigration.",
keywords = "disability, immigration, mobility, Canada",
author = "Robert Wilton and Stine Hansen and Edward Hall",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cag.12361",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "389--400",
journal = "Canadian Geographer",
issn = "0008-3658",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Disabled people, medical inadmissibility, and the differential politics of immigration. / Wilton, Robert (Lead / Corresponding author); Hansen, Stine; Hall, Edward.

In: Canadian Geographer, Vol. 61, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 389-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disabled people, medical inadmissibility, and the differential politics of immigration

AU - Wilton, Robert

AU - Hansen, Stine

AU - Hall, Edward

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - This paper is concerned with the impact of medical inadmissibility provisions in Canada’s immigration law on applicants with disabilities. The paper draws on key informant interviews, policy analysis, and Ministry of Immigration data on medical inadmissibility findings. We follow the lead of recent mobilities scholarship to examine how the immigration system is enacted, reproduced, and contested over time. From this perspective, we see that recent court challenges to the statutory provisions have created additional procedural space for applicants to contest findings of inadmissibility. However, the legitimacy of excessive demand as a basis for exclusion remains firmly in place, while recent immigration policy changes signal an intensification of measures to limit the social reproductive costs of immigration.

AB - This paper is concerned with the impact of medical inadmissibility provisions in Canada’s immigration law on applicants with disabilities. The paper draws on key informant interviews, policy analysis, and Ministry of Immigration data on medical inadmissibility findings. We follow the lead of recent mobilities scholarship to examine how the immigration system is enacted, reproduced, and contested over time. From this perspective, we see that recent court challenges to the statutory provisions have created additional procedural space for applicants to contest findings of inadmissibility. However, the legitimacy of excessive demand as a basis for exclusion remains firmly in place, while recent immigration policy changes signal an intensification of measures to limit the social reproductive costs of immigration.

KW - disability

KW - immigration

KW - mobility

KW - Canada

U2 - 10.1111/cag.12361

DO - 10.1111/cag.12361

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 389

EP - 400

JO - Canadian Geographer

JF - Canadian Geographer

SN - 0008-3658

IS - 3

ER -