Do current and magnetic helicities have the same sign?

A. J. B. Russell (Lead / Corresponding author), P. Demoulin, G. Hornig, D. I. Pontin, S. Candelaresi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Current helicity, Hc, and magnetic helicity, Hm, are two main quantities used to characterize magnetic fields. For example, such quantities have been widely used to characterize solar active regions and their ejecta (magnetic clouds). It seems commonly assumed that Hc and Hm have the same sign, but this has not been rigorously addressed beyond the simple case of linear force-free fields. We aim to answer whether HmHc ≥ 0 in general and whether it is true over some useful set of magnetic fields. This question is addressed analytically and with numerical examples. The main focus is on cylindrically-symmetric straight flux tubes referred to as flux ropes (FRs), using the relative magnetic helicity with respect to a straight (untwisted) reference field. Counterexamples with HmHc < 0 have been found for cylinder-symmetric FRs with finite plasma pressure, and for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs in which the poloidal field component changes direction. Our main result is a proof that HmHc ≥ 0 is true for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs where the toroidal field and poloidal field components are each of a single sign, and the poloidal component does not exceed the toroidal component. We conclude that the conjecture that current and magnetic helicities have the same sign is not true in general, however, it is true for a set of flux ropes of importance to coronal and heliospheric physics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11
Number of pages11
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume884
Issue number1
Early online date10 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

magnetic field
toroidal field
ejecta
physics
magnetic clouds
plasma
plasma pressure
magnetic fields
tubes

Keywords

  • Magnetic fields - Sun
  • corona - Sun
  • heliosphere

Cite this

@article{791f91ee5b8e44f1afaa396745f8164d,
title = "Do current and magnetic helicities have the same sign?",
abstract = "Current helicity, Hc, and magnetic helicity, Hm, are two main quantities used to characterize magnetic fields. For example, such quantities have been widely used to characterize solar active regions and their ejecta (magnetic clouds). It seems commonly assumed that Hc and Hm have the same sign, but this has not been rigorously addressed beyond the simple case of linear force-free fields. We aim to answer whether HmHc ≥ 0 in general and whether it is true over some useful set of magnetic fields. This question is addressed analytically and with numerical examples. The main focus is on cylindrically-symmetric straight flux tubes referred to as flux ropes (FRs), using the relative magnetic helicity with respect to a straight (untwisted) reference field. Counterexamples with HmHc < 0 have been found for cylinder-symmetric FRs with finite plasma pressure, and for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs in which the poloidal field component changes direction. Our main result is a proof that HmHc ≥ 0 is true for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs where the toroidal field and poloidal field components are each of a single sign, and the poloidal component does not exceed the toroidal component. We conclude that the conjecture that current and magnetic helicities have the same sign is not true in general, however, it is true for a set of flux ropes of importance to coronal and heliospheric physics.",
keywords = "Magnetic fields - Sun, corona - Sun, heliosphere",
author = "Russell, {A. J. B.} and P. Demoulin and G. Hornig and Pontin, {D. I.} and S. Candelaresi",
note = "Funding: STFC ST/K000993/1 and ST/N000714/1.",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/ab40b4",
language = "English",
volume = "884",
pages = "11",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "American Astronomical Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do current and magnetic helicities have the same sign?

AU - Russell, A. J. B.

AU - Demoulin, P.

AU - Hornig, G.

AU - Pontin, D. I.

AU - Candelaresi, S.

N1 - Funding: STFC ST/K000993/1 and ST/N000714/1.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Current helicity, Hc, and magnetic helicity, Hm, are two main quantities used to characterize magnetic fields. For example, such quantities have been widely used to characterize solar active regions and their ejecta (magnetic clouds). It seems commonly assumed that Hc and Hm have the same sign, but this has not been rigorously addressed beyond the simple case of linear force-free fields. We aim to answer whether HmHc ≥ 0 in general and whether it is true over some useful set of magnetic fields. This question is addressed analytically and with numerical examples. The main focus is on cylindrically-symmetric straight flux tubes referred to as flux ropes (FRs), using the relative magnetic helicity with respect to a straight (untwisted) reference field. Counterexamples with HmHc < 0 have been found for cylinder-symmetric FRs with finite plasma pressure, and for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs in which the poloidal field component changes direction. Our main result is a proof that HmHc ≥ 0 is true for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs where the toroidal field and poloidal field components are each of a single sign, and the poloidal component does not exceed the toroidal component. We conclude that the conjecture that current and magnetic helicities have the same sign is not true in general, however, it is true for a set of flux ropes of importance to coronal and heliospheric physics.

AB - Current helicity, Hc, and magnetic helicity, Hm, are two main quantities used to characterize magnetic fields. For example, such quantities have been widely used to characterize solar active regions and their ejecta (magnetic clouds). It seems commonly assumed that Hc and Hm have the same sign, but this has not been rigorously addressed beyond the simple case of linear force-free fields. We aim to answer whether HmHc ≥ 0 in general and whether it is true over some useful set of magnetic fields. This question is addressed analytically and with numerical examples. The main focus is on cylindrically-symmetric straight flux tubes referred to as flux ropes (FRs), using the relative magnetic helicity with respect to a straight (untwisted) reference field. Counterexamples with HmHc < 0 have been found for cylinder-symmetric FRs with finite plasma pressure, and for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs in which the poloidal field component changes direction. Our main result is a proof that HmHc ≥ 0 is true for force-free cylinder-symmetric FRs where the toroidal field and poloidal field components are each of a single sign, and the poloidal component does not exceed the toroidal component. We conclude that the conjecture that current and magnetic helicities have the same sign is not true in general, however, it is true for a set of flux ropes of importance to coronal and heliospheric physics.

KW - Magnetic fields - Sun

KW - corona - Sun

KW - heliosphere

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ab40b4

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ab40b4

M3 - Article

VL - 884

SP - 11

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1

ER -