Do researchers feel an LREC hinders research?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: All medical professionals in the UK who wish to undertake clinical trials involving NHS patients must first obtain ethical approval. Although Local Research Ethics Committees (LRECs) play a crucial role, few studies have attempted to determine what researchers think about the effectiveness of their ethics committee. OBJECTIVE: To explore researchers' views as to the effectiveness or otherwise of their LREC. SUBJECTS: 78 experienced medical researchers. FINDINGS: While most researchers did not feel that the LREC made it more difficult to carry out their research, without good cause, a substantial minority was critical of the Committee, with many feeling that its approach was overly pedantic. CONCLUSION: There may be a need for greater dialogue between ethics committees and researchers, so that researchers understand why committees ask for certain information, and committees are aware of problems their requirements may cause.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)17-19
    Number of pages3
    JournalBulletin of Medical Ethics
    Issue number165
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2001

    Fingerprint

    Research Ethics Committees
    Research Personnel
    Research
    Ethics Committees
    Emotions
    Clinical Trials

    Keywords

    • Medical research
    • Medical ethics
    • Clinical trials
    • Ethics committees

    Cite this

    @article{5358ff79b24f402cb22e7ef4c29772d0,
    title = "Do researchers feel an LREC hinders research?",
    abstract = "BACKGROUND: All medical professionals in the UK who wish to undertake clinical trials involving NHS patients must first obtain ethical approval. Although Local Research Ethics Committees (LRECs) play a crucial role, few studies have attempted to determine what researchers think about the effectiveness of their ethics committee. OBJECTIVE: To explore researchers' views as to the effectiveness or otherwise of their LREC. SUBJECTS: 78 experienced medical researchers. FINDINGS: While most researchers did not feel that the LREC made it more difficult to carry out their research, without good cause, a substantial minority was critical of the Committee, with many feeling that its approach was overly pedantic. CONCLUSION: There may be a need for greater dialogue between ethics committees and researchers, so that researchers understand why committees ask for certain information, and committees are aware of problems their requirements may cause.",
    keywords = "Medical research, Medical ethics, Clinical trials, Ethics committees",
    author = "Pamela Ferguson",
    note = "dc.publisher: Bioethics Publications Ltd",
    year = "2001",
    month = "2",
    language = "English",
    pages = "17--19",
    journal = "Bulletin of Medical Ethics",
    issn = "0962-9564",
    publisher = "Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd",
    number = "165",

    }

    Do researchers feel an LREC hinders research? / Ferguson, Pamela.

    In: Bulletin of Medical Ethics, No. 165, 02.2001, p. 17-19.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Do researchers feel an LREC hinders research?

    AU - Ferguson, Pamela

    N1 - dc.publisher: Bioethics Publications Ltd

    PY - 2001/2

    Y1 - 2001/2

    N2 - BACKGROUND: All medical professionals in the UK who wish to undertake clinical trials involving NHS patients must first obtain ethical approval. Although Local Research Ethics Committees (LRECs) play a crucial role, few studies have attempted to determine what researchers think about the effectiveness of their ethics committee. OBJECTIVE: To explore researchers' views as to the effectiveness or otherwise of their LREC. SUBJECTS: 78 experienced medical researchers. FINDINGS: While most researchers did not feel that the LREC made it more difficult to carry out their research, without good cause, a substantial minority was critical of the Committee, with many feeling that its approach was overly pedantic. CONCLUSION: There may be a need for greater dialogue between ethics committees and researchers, so that researchers understand why committees ask for certain information, and committees are aware of problems their requirements may cause.

    AB - BACKGROUND: All medical professionals in the UK who wish to undertake clinical trials involving NHS patients must first obtain ethical approval. Although Local Research Ethics Committees (LRECs) play a crucial role, few studies have attempted to determine what researchers think about the effectiveness of their ethics committee. OBJECTIVE: To explore researchers' views as to the effectiveness or otherwise of their LREC. SUBJECTS: 78 experienced medical researchers. FINDINGS: While most researchers did not feel that the LREC made it more difficult to carry out their research, without good cause, a substantial minority was critical of the Committee, with many feeling that its approach was overly pedantic. CONCLUSION: There may be a need for greater dialogue between ethics committees and researchers, so that researchers understand why committees ask for certain information, and committees are aware of problems their requirements may cause.

    KW - Medical research

    KW - Medical ethics

    KW - Clinical trials

    KW - Ethics committees

    M3 - Article

    SP - 17

    EP - 19

    JO - Bulletin of Medical Ethics

    JF - Bulletin of Medical Ethics

    SN - 0962-9564

    IS - 165

    ER -