Do you get value for money when you buy an expensive pair of running shoes?

R. Clinghan, Graham Arnold, Tim Drew, Lynda Cochrane, R. J. Abboud

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: This investigation aims to determine if more expensive running shoes provide better cushioning of plantar pressure and are more comfortable than low-cost alternatives from the same brand.

    Methods: Three pairs of running shoes were purchased from three different manufacturers at three different price ranges: low (40-45) pound, medium (60-65) pound and high (70-75) pound. Plantar pressure was recorded with the Pedar (R) in-shoe pressure measurement system. Comfort was assessed with a 100 mm visual analogue scale. A follow-on study was conducted to ascertain if shoe cushioning and comfort were comparable to walking while running on a treadmill. Forty-three and 9 male subjects participated in the main and follow-on studies, respectively. The main outcome measure was the evaluation of plantar pressure and comfort.

    Results: Plantar pressure measurements were recorded from under the heel, across the forefoot and under the great toe. Differences in plantar pressure were recorded between models and between brands in relation to cost. Shoe performance was comparable between walking and running trials on a treadmill. No significant difference was observed between shoes and test occasions in terms of comfort.

    Conclusions: Low- and medium-cost running shoes in each of the three brands tested provided the same (if not better) cushioning of plantar pressure as high-cost running shoes. Cushioning was comparable when walking and running on a treadmill. Comfort is a subjective sensation based on individual preferences and was not related to either the distribution of plantar pressure or cost.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)189-193
    Number of pages5
    JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
    Volume42
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • COMFORT
    • FOOT
    • WALKING
    • SYSTEM
    • IMPACT
    • BONE

    Cite this

    Clinghan, R. ; Arnold, Graham ; Drew, Tim ; Cochrane, Lynda ; Abboud, R. J. / Do you get value for money when you buy an expensive pair of running shoes?. In: British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 42, No. 3. pp. 189-193.
    @article{e2b4c75365b94b3da64111448065a964,
    title = "Do you get value for money when you buy an expensive pair of running shoes?",
    abstract = "Objective: This investigation aims to determine if more expensive running shoes provide better cushioning of plantar pressure and are more comfortable than low-cost alternatives from the same brand.Methods: Three pairs of running shoes were purchased from three different manufacturers at three different price ranges: low (40-45) pound, medium (60-65) pound and high (70-75) pound. Plantar pressure was recorded with the Pedar (R) in-shoe pressure measurement system. Comfort was assessed with a 100 mm visual analogue scale. A follow-on study was conducted to ascertain if shoe cushioning and comfort were comparable to walking while running on a treadmill. Forty-three and 9 male subjects participated in the main and follow-on studies, respectively. The main outcome measure was the evaluation of plantar pressure and comfort.Results: Plantar pressure measurements were recorded from under the heel, across the forefoot and under the great toe. Differences in plantar pressure were recorded between models and between brands in relation to cost. Shoe performance was comparable between walking and running trials on a treadmill. No significant difference was observed between shoes and test occasions in terms of comfort.Conclusions: Low- and medium-cost running shoes in each of the three brands tested provided the same (if not better) cushioning of plantar pressure as high-cost running shoes. Cushioning was comparable when walking and running on a treadmill. Comfort is a subjective sensation based on individual preferences and was not related to either the distribution of plantar pressure or cost.",
    keywords = "COMFORT, FOOT, WALKING, SYSTEM, IMPACT, BONE",
    author = "R. Clinghan and Graham Arnold and Tim Drew and Lynda Cochrane and Abboud, {R. J.}",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.1136/bjsm.2007.038844",
    language = "English",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "189--193",
    journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
    issn = "0306-3674",
    publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
    number = "3",

    }

    Do you get value for money when you buy an expensive pair of running shoes? / Clinghan, R.; Arnold, Graham; Drew, Tim; Cochrane, Lynda; Abboud, R. J.

    In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008, p. 189-193.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Do you get value for money when you buy an expensive pair of running shoes?

    AU - Clinghan, R.

    AU - Arnold, Graham

    AU - Drew, Tim

    AU - Cochrane, Lynda

    AU - Abboud, R. J.

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Objective: This investigation aims to determine if more expensive running shoes provide better cushioning of plantar pressure and are more comfortable than low-cost alternatives from the same brand.Methods: Three pairs of running shoes were purchased from three different manufacturers at three different price ranges: low (40-45) pound, medium (60-65) pound and high (70-75) pound. Plantar pressure was recorded with the Pedar (R) in-shoe pressure measurement system. Comfort was assessed with a 100 mm visual analogue scale. A follow-on study was conducted to ascertain if shoe cushioning and comfort were comparable to walking while running on a treadmill. Forty-three and 9 male subjects participated in the main and follow-on studies, respectively. The main outcome measure was the evaluation of plantar pressure and comfort.Results: Plantar pressure measurements were recorded from under the heel, across the forefoot and under the great toe. Differences in plantar pressure were recorded between models and between brands in relation to cost. Shoe performance was comparable between walking and running trials on a treadmill. No significant difference was observed between shoes and test occasions in terms of comfort.Conclusions: Low- and medium-cost running shoes in each of the three brands tested provided the same (if not better) cushioning of plantar pressure as high-cost running shoes. Cushioning was comparable when walking and running on a treadmill. Comfort is a subjective sensation based on individual preferences and was not related to either the distribution of plantar pressure or cost.

    AB - Objective: This investigation aims to determine if more expensive running shoes provide better cushioning of plantar pressure and are more comfortable than low-cost alternatives from the same brand.Methods: Three pairs of running shoes were purchased from three different manufacturers at three different price ranges: low (40-45) pound, medium (60-65) pound and high (70-75) pound. Plantar pressure was recorded with the Pedar (R) in-shoe pressure measurement system. Comfort was assessed with a 100 mm visual analogue scale. A follow-on study was conducted to ascertain if shoe cushioning and comfort were comparable to walking while running on a treadmill. Forty-three and 9 male subjects participated in the main and follow-on studies, respectively. The main outcome measure was the evaluation of plantar pressure and comfort.Results: Plantar pressure measurements were recorded from under the heel, across the forefoot and under the great toe. Differences in plantar pressure were recorded between models and between brands in relation to cost. Shoe performance was comparable between walking and running trials on a treadmill. No significant difference was observed between shoes and test occasions in terms of comfort.Conclusions: Low- and medium-cost running shoes in each of the three brands tested provided the same (if not better) cushioning of plantar pressure as high-cost running shoes. Cushioning was comparable when walking and running on a treadmill. Comfort is a subjective sensation based on individual preferences and was not related to either the distribution of plantar pressure or cost.

    KW - COMFORT

    KW - FOOT

    KW - WALKING

    KW - SYSTEM

    KW - IMPACT

    KW - BONE

    U2 - 10.1136/bjsm.2007.038844

    DO - 10.1136/bjsm.2007.038844

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 189

    EP - 193

    JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

    JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

    SN - 0306-3674

    IS - 3

    ER -