Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment: A natural experiment

Annie Quick, Jan Rasmus Boehnke, John Wright, Kate E. Pickett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    111 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background
    Evidence suggests that the process of taking part in health research can improve participants’ health, independent of any intended intervention. However, no research has yet explored whether these effects differ across socioeconomic groups. If the effect of mere participation in health research also has a social gradient this could increase health inequalities and bias research results. This study used the Born in Bradford family cohort (BIB) to explore whether simply taking part in BIB had improved participants’ health and, if so, whether this effect was mediated by socioeconomic status.

    Methods
    Survey data on self-reported health behaviours were collected between 2007 and 2010 as part of BIB. These were augmented by clinical data on birth weight. Pregnant women on their second pregnancy, joining BIB for the first time formed the control group. Their health was compared to women on their second pregnancy who had both pregnancies within the study, who formed the exposed group. In order to limit the inherent bias in a non-randomised study, propensity score analysis was used, matching on age, ethnicity, education and date of questionnaire. The results were then compared according to mothers' education.

    Results
    Of six outcomes tested, only alcohol consumption showed a statistically significant reduction with exposure to BIB (OR: 0.35, 95% CIs 0.13, 0.92). Although effect estimates were larger for women with higher education compared to lower education, these effects were not statistically significant.

    Conclusions
    Despite one significant finding, these results overall are insufficient to conclude that simply taking part in BIB affected participants’ health. We recommend that socioeconomic status is considered in future studies testing effects of research participation, and that randomised studies with larger sample sizes are conducted.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages9
    JournalBMC Health Services Research
    Volume17
    Issue number79
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • Psychosis
    • Severe mental illness
    • Schizophrenia
    • Bipolar disorder
    • Diabetes
    • Self-management
    • Core outcome set
    • Comorbidity
    • Complex interventions

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does involvement in a cohort study improve health and affect health inequalities? A natural experiment: A natural experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this