TY - GEN
T1 - Does number interference occur during sentence processing?
AU - Suckow, Katja
AU - van Gompel, Roger P.G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research presented here was supported by the ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council).
Publisher Copyright:
© CogSci 2012.All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Models of interference in sentence processing claim that object relative clauses are harder to process than subject relatives due to interference between the subject and object noun phrase. The interference effect for object relatives at the verb should be more pronounced when the two noun phrases retrieved from memory are similar. To test this, two eye tracking experiments manipulated whether the number feature of the noun phrases (singular or plural) was either the same or different. Both experiments showed the well-known relative clause effect. However, in Experiment 1 the effect of number congruency was in the opposite direction from that predicted by interference. Experiment 2 showed the interaction predicted by similarity based interference at sentence wrap-up, but because this interaction was observed later than the relative clause effect and only occurred in Experiment 2, it suggests that retrieval interference due to cue overlap is a weak effect that might be the result of a checking procedure in syntactically complex sentences.
AB - Models of interference in sentence processing claim that object relative clauses are harder to process than subject relatives due to interference between the subject and object noun phrase. The interference effect for object relatives at the verb should be more pronounced when the two noun phrases retrieved from memory are similar. To test this, two eye tracking experiments manipulated whether the number feature of the noun phrases (singular or plural) was either the same or different. Both experiments showed the well-known relative clause effect. However, in Experiment 1 the effect of number congruency was in the opposite direction from that predicted by interference. Experiment 2 showed the interaction predicted by similarity based interference at sentence wrap-up, but because this interaction was observed later than the relative clause effect and only occurred in Experiment 2, it suggests that retrieval interference due to cue overlap is a weak effect that might be the result of a checking procedure in syntactically complex sentences.
KW - sentence processing
KW - similarity based interference
KW - working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048331866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85048331866
SN - 9781622763047
T3 - Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012
SP - 2357
EP - 2362
BT - 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2012 (CogSci 2012)
A2 - Miyake, Naomi
A2 - Peebles, David
A2 - Cooper, Richard
PB - The Cognitive Science Society
T2 - 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World, CogSci 2012
Y2 - 1 August 2012 through 4 August 2012
ER -