Does offering an incentive payment improve recruitment to clinical trials and increase the proportion of socially deprived and elderly participants?

Claudine G. Jennings (Lead / Corresponding author), Thomas M. MacDonald, Li Wei, Morris J. Brown, Lewis McConnachie, Isla S. Mackenzie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)
    109 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Patient recruitment into clinical trials is a major challenge, and the elderly, socially deprived and those with multiple comorbidities are often underrepresented. The idea of paying patients an incentive to participate in research is controversial, and evidence is needed to evaluate this as a recruitment strategy. METHOD: In this study, we sought to assess the impact on clinical trial recruitment of a £100 incentive payment and whether the offer of this payment attracted more elderly and socially deprived patients. A total of 1,015 potential patients for five clinical trials (SCOT, FAST and PATHWAY 1, 2 and 3) were randomised to receive either a standard trial invitation letter or a trial invitation letter containing an incentive offer of £100. To receive payment, patients had to attend a screening visit and consent to be screened (that is, sign a consent form). To maintain equality, eventually all patients who signed a consent form were paid £100. RESULTS: The £100 incentive offer increased positive response to the first invitation letter from 24.7% to 31.6%, an increase of 6.9% (P < 0.05). The incentive offer increased the number of patients signing a consent form by 5.1% (P < 0.05). The mean age of patients who responded positively to the invitation letter was 66.5 ± 8.7 years, whereas those who responded negatively were significantly older, with a mean age of 68.9 ± 9.0 years. The incentive offer did not influence the age of patients responding. The incentive offer did not improve response in the most socially deprived areas, and the response from patients in these areas was significantly lower overall.CONCLUSION: A £100 incentive payment offer led to small but significant improvements in both patient response to a clinical trial invitation letter and in the number of patients who consented to be screened. The incentive payment did not attract elderly or more socially deprived patients.


    Original languageEnglish
    Article number80
    Number of pages9
    JournalTrials
    Volume16
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2015

    Keywords

    • Clinical trial recruitment
    • Incentive payment
    • Patient demographics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Does offering an incentive payment improve recruitment to clinical trials and increase the proportion of socially deprived and elderly participants?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this