Does practice make perfect? Independent reading quantity, quality and student achievement

K. J. Topping, J. Samuels, T. Paul

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Does reading practice make perfect? Or is reading achievement related to the quality of practice as well as the quantity? To answer these questions, data on 45,670 students in grades 1e12 who read over 3 million books were analyzed. Measures largely of quantity (engaged reading volume) and purely of quality (success in reading comprehension) showed a positive relationship with achievement gain at all levels of achievement. However, both high quantity and high quality in combination were necessary for high achievement gains, especially for older students. Both were weakly associated with student initial reading achievement, but more strongly associated with the classroom in which the student was enrolled, possibly suggesting the properties of teacher intervention in guiding independent reading were important. Implications for theory-building, research and practice are explored.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)253-264
    Number of pages12
    JournalLearning and Instruction
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

    Fingerprint

    Reading
    Students
    student
    comprehension
    classroom
    teacher
    Research

    Keywords

    • Reading
    • Practice
    • Comprehension
    • Achievement
    • Teacher intervention
    • Computer assessment

    Cite this

    @article{fcc5a1e0967948dea98e6b2a2ac1ae60,
    title = "Does practice make perfect? Independent reading quantity, quality and student achievement",
    abstract = "Does reading practice make perfect? Or is reading achievement related to the quality of practice as well as the quantity? To answer these questions, data on 45,670 students in grades 1e12 who read over 3 million books were analyzed. Measures largely of quantity (engaged reading volume) and purely of quality (success in reading comprehension) showed a positive relationship with achievement gain at all levels of achievement. However, both high quantity and high quality in combination were necessary for high achievement gains, especially for older students. Both were weakly associated with student initial reading achievement, but more strongly associated with the classroom in which the student was enrolled, possibly suggesting the properties of teacher intervention in guiding independent reading were important. Implications for theory-building, research and practice are explored.",
    keywords = "Reading, Practice, Comprehension, Achievement, Teacher intervention, Computer assessment",
    author = "Topping, {K. J.} and J. Samuels and T. Paul",
    note = "dc.publisher: Elsevier",
    year = "2007",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "253--264",
    journal = "Learning and Instruction",
    issn = "0959-4752",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "3",

    }

    Does practice make perfect? Independent reading quantity, quality and student achievement. / Topping, K. J.; Samuels, J.; Paul, T.

    In: Learning and Instruction, Vol. 17, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 253-264.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Does practice make perfect? Independent reading quantity, quality and student achievement

    AU - Topping, K. J.

    AU - Samuels, J.

    AU - Paul, T.

    N1 - dc.publisher: Elsevier

    PY - 2007/6

    Y1 - 2007/6

    N2 - Does reading practice make perfect? Or is reading achievement related to the quality of practice as well as the quantity? To answer these questions, data on 45,670 students in grades 1e12 who read over 3 million books were analyzed. Measures largely of quantity (engaged reading volume) and purely of quality (success in reading comprehension) showed a positive relationship with achievement gain at all levels of achievement. However, both high quantity and high quality in combination were necessary for high achievement gains, especially for older students. Both were weakly associated with student initial reading achievement, but more strongly associated with the classroom in which the student was enrolled, possibly suggesting the properties of teacher intervention in guiding independent reading were important. Implications for theory-building, research and practice are explored.

    AB - Does reading practice make perfect? Or is reading achievement related to the quality of practice as well as the quantity? To answer these questions, data on 45,670 students in grades 1e12 who read over 3 million books were analyzed. Measures largely of quantity (engaged reading volume) and purely of quality (success in reading comprehension) showed a positive relationship with achievement gain at all levels of achievement. However, both high quantity and high quality in combination were necessary for high achievement gains, especially for older students. Both were weakly associated with student initial reading achievement, but more strongly associated with the classroom in which the student was enrolled, possibly suggesting the properties of teacher intervention in guiding independent reading were important. Implications for theory-building, research and practice are explored.

    KW - Reading

    KW - Practice

    KW - Comprehension

    KW - Achievement

    KW - Teacher intervention

    KW - Computer assessment

    U2 - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 253

    EP - 264

    JO - Learning and Instruction

    JF - Learning and Instruction

    SN - 0959-4752

    IS - 3

    ER -