Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study

Caroline Erolin (Lead / Corresponding author), Clare Lamb, Roger Soames, Caroline Wilkinson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

1 Citation (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study investigated the haptic ‘dissection’ of a digital model of the hand and wrist in anatomy education at both undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) levels. The study ran over five successive years and was split into three discreet phases. Phase one compared the results of PG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Phase two compared the results of UG students between control and haptic groups. Phase three compared the results of UG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Results for all phases indicate that use of the model, both through haptic and non-haptic interfaces produced some significantly improved test results. The non-haptic group performing the strongest overall indicating that the addition of haptic feedback may not be beneficial to student learning.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedicine Meets Virtual Reality 22
EditorsJames D. Westwood, Susan W. Westwood, Li Fellander-Tsai, Cali M. Fidopiastis, Alan Liu, Steven Senger, Kirby G. Vosburgh
Place of PublicationNetherlands
PublisherIOS Press
Pages110-117
Number of pages8
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781614996255
ISBN (Print)9781614996248
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Publication series

NameStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
PublisherIOS Press
Volume220

Fingerprint

learning
Group
student
education

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • dissection
  • haptic
  • virtual
  • 3D visualization

Cite this

Erolin, C., Lamb, C., Soames, R., & Wilkinson, C. (2016). Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study. In J. D. Westwood, S. W. Westwood, L. Fellander-Tsai, C. M. Fidopiastis, A. Liu, S. Senger, & K. G. Vosburgh (Eds.), Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22 (1st ed., pp. 110-117). (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics; Vol. 220). Netherlands: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-110
Erolin, Caroline ; Lamb, Clare ; Soames, Roger ; Wilkinson, Caroline. / Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22. editor / James D. Westwood ; Susan W. Westwood ; Li Fellander-Tsai ; Cali M. Fidopiastis ; Alan Liu ; Steven Senger ; Kirby G. Vosburgh. 1st. ed. Netherlands : IOS Press, 2016. pp. 110-117 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics).
@inbook{fa753236212044ba9c535d074a791255,
title = "Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study",
abstract = "This study investigated the haptic ‘dissection’ of a digital model of the hand and wrist in anatomy education at both undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) levels. The study ran over five successive years and was split into three discreet phases. Phase one compared the results of PG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Phase two compared the results of UG students between control and haptic groups. Phase three compared the results of UG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Results for all phases indicate that use of the model, both through haptic and non-haptic interfaces produced some significantly improved test results. The non-haptic group performing the strongest overall indicating that the addition of haptic feedback may not be beneficial to student learning.",
keywords = "Anatomy, dissection, haptic, virtual, 3D visualization",
author = "Caroline Erolin and Clare Lamb and Roger Soames and Caroline Wilkinson",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-110",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781614996248",
series = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",
publisher = "IOS Press",
pages = "110--117",
editor = "Westwood, {James D.} and Westwood, {Susan W.} and Li Fellander-Tsai and Fidopiastis, {Cali M.} and Alan Liu and Steven Senger and Vosburgh, {Kirby G.}",
booktitle = "Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22",
address = "Netherlands",
edition = "1st",

}

Erolin, C, Lamb, C, Soames, R & Wilkinson, C 2016, Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study. in JD Westwood, SW Westwood, L Fellander-Tsai, CM Fidopiastis, A Liu, S Senger & KG Vosburgh (eds), Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22. 1st edn, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 220, IOS Press, Netherlands, pp. 110-117. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-110

Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study. / Erolin, Caroline (Lead / Corresponding author); Lamb, Clare; Soames, Roger; Wilkinson, Caroline.

Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22. ed. / James D. Westwood; Susan W. Westwood; Li Fellander-Tsai; Cali M. Fidopiastis; Alan Liu; Steven Senger; Kirby G. Vosburgh. 1st. ed. Netherlands : IOS Press, 2016. p. 110-117 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics; Vol. 220).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study

AU - Erolin, Caroline

AU - Lamb, Clare

AU - Soames, Roger

AU - Wilkinson, Caroline

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - This study investigated the haptic ‘dissection’ of a digital model of the hand and wrist in anatomy education at both undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) levels. The study ran over five successive years and was split into three discreet phases. Phase one compared the results of PG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Phase two compared the results of UG students between control and haptic groups. Phase three compared the results of UG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Results for all phases indicate that use of the model, both through haptic and non-haptic interfaces produced some significantly improved test results. The non-haptic group performing the strongest overall indicating that the addition of haptic feedback may not be beneficial to student learning.

AB - This study investigated the haptic ‘dissection’ of a digital model of the hand and wrist in anatomy education at both undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) levels. The study ran over five successive years and was split into three discreet phases. Phase one compared the results of PG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Phase two compared the results of UG students between control and haptic groups. Phase three compared the results of UG students across control, non-haptic and haptic groups. Results for all phases indicate that use of the model, both through haptic and non-haptic interfaces produced some significantly improved test results. The non-haptic group performing the strongest overall indicating that the addition of haptic feedback may not be beneficial to student learning.

KW - Anatomy

KW - dissection

KW - haptic

KW - virtual

KW - 3D visualization

UR - http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/42516

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-110

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-110

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781614996248

T3 - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

SP - 110

EP - 117

BT - Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22

A2 - Westwood, James D.

A2 - Westwood, Susan W.

A2 - Fellander-Tsai, Li

A2 - Fidopiastis, Cali M.

A2 - Liu, Alan

A2 - Senger, Steven

A2 - Vosburgh, Kirby G.

PB - IOS Press

CY - Netherlands

ER -

Erolin C, Lamb C, Soames R, Wilkinson C. Does virtual haptic dissection improve student learning? A multi-year comparative study. In Westwood JD, Westwood SW, Fellander-Tsai L, Fidopiastis CM, Liu A, Senger S, Vosburgh KG, editors, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22. 1st ed. Netherlands: IOS Press. 2016. p. 110-117. (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-110