Doing classic grounded theory: the data analysis process

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    611 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This case study shares some of the methodological challenges I faced during my PhD research from 2007 to 2010. My study focused on Condition Management Programmes, part of the UK Government's Pathways to Work initiative, which provided work-focused interventions for people claiming health-related benefits. In 2007, there had been very little research on Condition Management Programmes, and there was little understanding about how they were actually being delivered at a ground level. As an inductive methodology suited to researching new areas, I decided to use classic grounded theory. The aim of classic grounded theory is to identify participants’ main concern and develop a theory that explains their behaviour. I interviewed health-care practitioners working in Condition Management Programmes and observed their treatment sessions with clients. By following the key stages of classic grounded theory (theoretical sampling, substantive coding, memo writing and theoretical coding), I developed a theory that explained practitioners’ decision-making processes. This case study provides a detailed account of some of the difficulties I encountered as I analysed my data and how these were resolved. I address the five key areas of data analysis that I found challenging: getting conceptual, choosing a core category, recognising theoretical saturation, achieving theoretical integration and manual versus computer-assisted analysis
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSAGE Research Methods Cases
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherSAGE Publications
    Number of pages18
    ISBN (Electronic)9781446273050
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    grounded theory
    data analysis
    coding
    management
    decision-making process
    health care
    methodology
    health

    Cite this

    Breckenridge, Jenna. / Doing classic grounded theory : the data analysis process. SAGE Research Methods Cases. London : SAGE Publications, 2014.
    @inbook{3769e77162ce430c8882760b9fc12b40,
    title = "Doing classic grounded theory: the data analysis process",
    abstract = "This case study shares some of the methodological challenges I faced during my PhD research from 2007 to 2010. My study focused on Condition Management Programmes, part of the UK Government's Pathways to Work initiative, which provided work-focused interventions for people claiming health-related benefits. In 2007, there had been very little research on Condition Management Programmes, and there was little understanding about how they were actually being delivered at a ground level. As an inductive methodology suited to researching new areas, I decided to use classic grounded theory. The aim of classic grounded theory is to identify participants’ main concern and develop a theory that explains their behaviour. I interviewed health-care practitioners working in Condition Management Programmes and observed their treatment sessions with clients. By following the key stages of classic grounded theory (theoretical sampling, substantive coding, memo writing and theoretical coding), I developed a theory that explained practitioners’ decision-making processes. This case study provides a detailed account of some of the difficulties I encountered as I analysed my data and how these were resolved. I address the five key areas of data analysis that I found challenging: getting conceptual, choosing a core category, recognising theoretical saturation, achieving theoretical integration and manual versus computer-assisted analysis",
    author = "Jenna Breckenridge",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.4135/978144627305014527673",
    language = "English",
    booktitle = "SAGE Research Methods Cases",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Doing classic grounded theory : the data analysis process. / Breckenridge, Jenna.

    SAGE Research Methods Cases. London : SAGE Publications, 2014.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Doing classic grounded theory

    T2 - the data analysis process

    AU - Breckenridge, Jenna

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - This case study shares some of the methodological challenges I faced during my PhD research from 2007 to 2010. My study focused on Condition Management Programmes, part of the UK Government's Pathways to Work initiative, which provided work-focused interventions for people claiming health-related benefits. In 2007, there had been very little research on Condition Management Programmes, and there was little understanding about how they were actually being delivered at a ground level. As an inductive methodology suited to researching new areas, I decided to use classic grounded theory. The aim of classic grounded theory is to identify participants’ main concern and develop a theory that explains their behaviour. I interviewed health-care practitioners working in Condition Management Programmes and observed their treatment sessions with clients. By following the key stages of classic grounded theory (theoretical sampling, substantive coding, memo writing and theoretical coding), I developed a theory that explained practitioners’ decision-making processes. This case study provides a detailed account of some of the difficulties I encountered as I analysed my data and how these were resolved. I address the five key areas of data analysis that I found challenging: getting conceptual, choosing a core category, recognising theoretical saturation, achieving theoretical integration and manual versus computer-assisted analysis

    AB - This case study shares some of the methodological challenges I faced during my PhD research from 2007 to 2010. My study focused on Condition Management Programmes, part of the UK Government's Pathways to Work initiative, which provided work-focused interventions for people claiming health-related benefits. In 2007, there had been very little research on Condition Management Programmes, and there was little understanding about how they were actually being delivered at a ground level. As an inductive methodology suited to researching new areas, I decided to use classic grounded theory. The aim of classic grounded theory is to identify participants’ main concern and develop a theory that explains their behaviour. I interviewed health-care practitioners working in Condition Management Programmes and observed their treatment sessions with clients. By following the key stages of classic grounded theory (theoretical sampling, substantive coding, memo writing and theoretical coding), I developed a theory that explained practitioners’ decision-making processes. This case study provides a detailed account of some of the difficulties I encountered as I analysed my data and how these were resolved. I address the five key areas of data analysis that I found challenging: getting conceptual, choosing a core category, recognising theoretical saturation, achieving theoretical integration and manual versus computer-assisted analysis

    U2 - 10.4135/978144627305014527673

    DO - 10.4135/978144627305014527673

    M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

    BT - SAGE Research Methods Cases

    PB - SAGE Publications

    CY - London

    ER -