Abstract
In this article, we evaluate alternative optimization frameworks for constructing portfolios of hedge funds. We compare the standard mean-variance optimization model with models based on CVaR, CDaR and Omega, for both conservative and aggressive hedge fund investment strategies. In order to implement the CVaR, CDaR and Omega optimization models, we propose a semi-parametric methodology, which is based on extreme value theory, copula and Monte Carlo simulation. We compare the semi-parametric approach with the standard, non-parametric approach, used to compute CVaR, CDaR and Omega, and the benchmark parametric approach, based on both static and dynamic mean-variance optimization. We report two main findings. The first is that the CVaR, CDaR and Omega models offer a significant improvement in terms of risk-adjusted portfolio performance over the parametric mean-variance model. The second is that semi-parametric estimation of the CVaR, CDaR and Omega models offers a very substantial improvement over non-parametric estimation. Our results are robust to the choice of target return, risk limit and estimation sample size. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 139-149 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 29 Aug 2012 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2013 |
Keywords
- Portfolio optimization
- Copula
- Extreme value theory
- Funds of hedge funds
- Monte Carlo simulation