Easy read health information for people with intellectual disabilities: a linguistic discourse analysis. What happens to language when it is simplified?

Susan Buell (Lead / Corresponding author), Gabrina Pounds, Karen Bunning, Peter Langdon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction
Easy Read health documents prepared for people with intellectual disabilities are often generated from Standard Texts. Language in Easy Read versions is typically assumed to be simpler. However, simplification of language may have unintended consequences. This study aimed to explore the differences in language used between Easy Read health material and the Standard Text versions of the same material produced for the general population.

Methods
Five Easy Read/Standard Text pairs were sampled and analysed using Systemic Functional Linguistics. This addressed: how people with intellectual disabilities and others were represented by language, the author stance in relation to the reader and the overall organisation of the text.

Results
The Easy Read versions often used language that was less empowering and inclusive.

Conclusion
Increased awareness of author power and better knowledge of the impact of language choice could help to redress these issues.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13293
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume37
Issue number6
Early online date28 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Easy read
  • Health
  • Intellectual disabilities
  • Linguistic discourse analysis
  • Empowerment
  • Simplification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Easy read health information for people with intellectual disabilities: a linguistic discourse analysis. What happens to language when it is simplified?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this