Abstract
Background: When a stoma is formed, people with a stoma have to adjust to managing this on a daily basis. There are a number of factors that can impact their self-efficacy to self-manage and their quality of life, including complications with their stoma, body image concerns, stigma, and the changes to their daily routine. Ecological momentary assessment studies in other populations have suggested that these constructs may vary over short periods of time and could be influenced by contextual factors. We, however, do not currently understand how context-specific factors such as what an individual is doing, who they are with, or where they are could impact upon quality of life and self-efficacy in people with a stoma.
Objective: This study aimed to understand whether quality of life and self-efficacy fluctuated over time and whether contextual factors (eg, activity, location, or company) and time of day were associated with quality of life and self-efficacy over the course of a week.
Methods: A smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment study was conducted over a 7-day period with measurements taken 3 times a day (morning, afternoon, and evening). Measures included demographic and clinical characteristics of age, gender, and time with a stoma, and self-reported self-efficacy and quality of life in the moment rated from 0 to 100 (with100 being the best). Multilevel modeling was conducted due to the clustering of responses within individuals, with models run for both self-efficacy and quality of life.
Results: In total, 62 participants completed the ecological momentary assessment protocol. Null multilevel models indicated that both self-efficacy and the quality of life varied over time, with around 35% of total variance explained by within-person variability, which suggests that there are intraindividual fluctuations over time. Results indicated that, for the self-efficacy model, people reporting from home had higher levels of self-efficacy than those outside the home (β=−3.8, 95% CI −6.4 to−1.3). In the quality of life model, there was increasing levels of quality of life throughout the day (afternoon: β=2.0, 95% CI0.8-3.2, evening: β=3.9, 95% CI 2.6-5.2).
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use ecological momentary assessment in this population. These findings indicate that, among people with a stoma, self-efficacy and quality of life do vary from moment to moment. Furthermore, contextual factors such as location and time of day are associated with self-efficacy and quality of life. There isa need to explore how future self-management interventions could enhance self-efficacy to self-manage outside of the home environment, with the potential for more dynamic and tailored interventions.
Objective: This study aimed to understand whether quality of life and self-efficacy fluctuated over time and whether contextual factors (eg, activity, location, or company) and time of day were associated with quality of life and self-efficacy over the course of a week.
Methods: A smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment study was conducted over a 7-day period with measurements taken 3 times a day (morning, afternoon, and evening). Measures included demographic and clinical characteristics of age, gender, and time with a stoma, and self-reported self-efficacy and quality of life in the moment rated from 0 to 100 (with100 being the best). Multilevel modeling was conducted due to the clustering of responses within individuals, with models run for both self-efficacy and quality of life.
Results: In total, 62 participants completed the ecological momentary assessment protocol. Null multilevel models indicated that both self-efficacy and the quality of life varied over time, with around 35% of total variance explained by within-person variability, which suggests that there are intraindividual fluctuations over time. Results indicated that, for the self-efficacy model, people reporting from home had higher levels of self-efficacy than those outside the home (β=−3.8, 95% CI −6.4 to−1.3). In the quality of life model, there was increasing levels of quality of life throughout the day (afternoon: β=2.0, 95% CI0.8-3.2, evening: β=3.9, 95% CI 2.6-5.2).
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use ecological momentary assessment in this population. These findings indicate that, among people with a stoma, self-efficacy and quality of life do vary from moment to moment. Furthermore, contextual factors such as location and time of day are associated with self-efficacy and quality of life. There isa need to explore how future self-management interventions could enhance self-efficacy to self-manage outside of the home environment, with the potential for more dynamic and tailored interventions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e57427 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Volume | 27 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jul 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- ecological momentary assessment
- assessment
- quality of life
- self-efficacy
- stoma
- digital health
- abdomen
- ileostomy
- bowel cancer
- bowel disease
- opening
- colostomy
- stigma
- daily routine
- smartphone
- mHealth
- mobile application
- app
- clinical
- multilevel modelling
- self-management
- intervention
- inflammatory bowel disease
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Informatics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ecological Momentary Assessment of the Quality of Life and Self-Efficacy Among People With a Stoma: Longitudinal Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Citations
- 1 Preprint
-
Quality of life and self-efficacy amongst people with a stoma: A longitudinal study using ecological momentary assessment
Goodman, W., Allsop, M., Downing, A., Munro, J., Hubbard, G. & Beeken, R. J. (Lead / Corresponding author), 19 Feb 2024, JMIR Publications, 26 p.Research output: Working paper/Preprint › Preprint
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver