Efficiency gaps, love of variety and international trade

Catia Montagna

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    37 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We develop a general equilibrium monopolistic competition model of trade with technical heterogeneity among firms and countries. With free entry, technical asymmetries between firms result in the endogenous determination of the equilibrium average efficiency of the industry. We show that trade reduces (increases) the minimum efficiency required to survive in the more (less) efficient country. This has important welfare implications: (1) Contrary to the constant elasticity of substitution homogeneous-firms model, trade affects welfare even when there is no love of variety. (2) There are circumstances in which trade liberalization leads to a loss of consumer welfare.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)27-44
    JournalEconomica
    Volume68
    Issue number269
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2001

    Fingerprint

    International trade
    Welfare implications
    Industry
    Asymmetry
    Monopolistic competition
    Free entry
    Consumer welfare
    Trade shows
    Firm heterogeneity
    Elasticity of substitution
    General equilibrium
    Trade liberalization

    Keywords

    • Monopolistic competition
    • International trade
    • Efficiency gaps

    Cite this

    Montagna, Catia. / Efficiency gaps, love of variety and international trade. In: Economica. 2001 ; Vol. 68, No. 269. pp. 27-44.
    @article{c810fd3dc4f640378809205b90cac3ea,
    title = "Efficiency gaps, love of variety and international trade",
    abstract = "We develop a general equilibrium monopolistic competition model of trade with technical heterogeneity among firms and countries. With free entry, technical asymmetries between firms result in the endogenous determination of the equilibrium average efficiency of the industry. We show that trade reduces (increases) the minimum efficiency required to survive in the more (less) efficient country. This has important welfare implications: (1) Contrary to the constant elasticity of substitution homogeneous-firms model, trade affects welfare even when there is no love of variety. (2) There are circumstances in which trade liberalization leads to a loss of consumer welfare.",
    keywords = "Monopolistic competition, International trade, Efficiency gaps",
    author = "Catia Montagna",
    note = "The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com",
    year = "2001",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1111/1468-0335.00231",
    language = "English",
    volume = "68",
    pages = "27--44",
    journal = "Economica",
    issn = "0013-0427",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "269",

    }

    Efficiency gaps, love of variety and international trade. / Montagna, Catia.

    In: Economica, Vol. 68, No. 269, 02.2001, p. 27-44.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Efficiency gaps, love of variety and international trade

    AU - Montagna, Catia

    N1 - The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com

    PY - 2001/2

    Y1 - 2001/2

    N2 - We develop a general equilibrium monopolistic competition model of trade with technical heterogeneity among firms and countries. With free entry, technical asymmetries between firms result in the endogenous determination of the equilibrium average efficiency of the industry. We show that trade reduces (increases) the minimum efficiency required to survive in the more (less) efficient country. This has important welfare implications: (1) Contrary to the constant elasticity of substitution homogeneous-firms model, trade affects welfare even when there is no love of variety. (2) There are circumstances in which trade liberalization leads to a loss of consumer welfare.

    AB - We develop a general equilibrium monopolistic competition model of trade with technical heterogeneity among firms and countries. With free entry, technical asymmetries between firms result in the endogenous determination of the equilibrium average efficiency of the industry. We show that trade reduces (increases) the minimum efficiency required to survive in the more (less) efficient country. This has important welfare implications: (1) Contrary to the constant elasticity of substitution homogeneous-firms model, trade affects welfare even when there is no love of variety. (2) There are circumstances in which trade liberalization leads to a loss of consumer welfare.

    KW - Monopolistic competition

    KW - International trade

    KW - Efficiency gaps

    U2 - 10.1111/1468-0335.00231

    DO - 10.1111/1468-0335.00231

    M3 - Article

    VL - 68

    SP - 27

    EP - 44

    JO - Economica

    JF - Economica

    SN - 0013-0427

    IS - 269

    ER -