Empirical phenomenology: principles and method

Judith A. Sixsmith, Andrew J. Sixsmith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is argued that phenomenological and empirical approaches to research are not antithetical. As long as its central principles are maintained, phenomenological enquiry could benefit from a more rigorous empirical framework. There are two objectives behind this paper. The first aim is to define the minimum methodological requirements of an "empirical phenomenology" for social sciences. This involves finding a common ground between phenomenological research on the one hand, and more empirical, "mainstream" social science on the other. The second aim is to define a suitable methodological tool that will fulfil the prerequisites of an empirical phenomenology. The Multiple Sorting Task (MST) is seen as appropriate in this respect and a description of the principles and procedure of the MST is provided. Examples from the authors' own research are used to illustrate how the MST operates within an empirical-phenomenological research design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-333
Number of pages21
JournalQuality and Quantity
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1987

Fingerprint

Phenomenology
phenomenology
Sorting
Social Sciences
social science
Empirical Research
research planning
empirical research
Requirements

Keywords

  • Social Science
  • Research Design
  • Common Ground
  • Empirical Approach
  • Methodological Tool

Cite this

Sixsmith, Judith A. ; Sixsmith, Andrew J. / Empirical phenomenology : principles and method. In: Quality and Quantity. 1987 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 313-333.
@article{6255272743124253b580d9413eedad83,
title = "Empirical phenomenology: principles and method",
abstract = "It is argued that phenomenological and empirical approaches to research are not antithetical. As long as its central principles are maintained, phenomenological enquiry could benefit from a more rigorous empirical framework. There are two objectives behind this paper. The first aim is to define the minimum methodological requirements of an {"}empirical phenomenology{"} for social sciences. This involves finding a common ground between phenomenological research on the one hand, and more empirical, {"}mainstream{"} social science on the other. The second aim is to define a suitable methodological tool that will fulfil the prerequisites of an empirical phenomenology. The Multiple Sorting Task (MST) is seen as appropriate in this respect and a description of the principles and procedure of the MST is provided. Examples from the authors' own research are used to illustrate how the MST operates within an empirical-phenomenological research design.",
keywords = "Social Science, Research Design, Common Ground, Empirical Approach, Methodological Tool",
author = "Sixsmith, {Judith A.} and Sixsmith, {Andrew J.}",
year = "1987",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/BF00134526",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "313--333",
journal = "Quality and Quantity",
issn = "0033-5177",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Empirical phenomenology : principles and method. / Sixsmith, Judith A.; Sixsmith, Andrew J.

In: Quality and Quantity, Vol. 21, No. 3, 09.1987, p. 313-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical phenomenology

T2 - principles and method

AU - Sixsmith, Judith A.

AU - Sixsmith, Andrew J.

PY - 1987/9

Y1 - 1987/9

N2 - It is argued that phenomenological and empirical approaches to research are not antithetical. As long as its central principles are maintained, phenomenological enquiry could benefit from a more rigorous empirical framework. There are two objectives behind this paper. The first aim is to define the minimum methodological requirements of an "empirical phenomenology" for social sciences. This involves finding a common ground between phenomenological research on the one hand, and more empirical, "mainstream" social science on the other. The second aim is to define a suitable methodological tool that will fulfil the prerequisites of an empirical phenomenology. The Multiple Sorting Task (MST) is seen as appropriate in this respect and a description of the principles and procedure of the MST is provided. Examples from the authors' own research are used to illustrate how the MST operates within an empirical-phenomenological research design.

AB - It is argued that phenomenological and empirical approaches to research are not antithetical. As long as its central principles are maintained, phenomenological enquiry could benefit from a more rigorous empirical framework. There are two objectives behind this paper. The first aim is to define the minimum methodological requirements of an "empirical phenomenology" for social sciences. This involves finding a common ground between phenomenological research on the one hand, and more empirical, "mainstream" social science on the other. The second aim is to define a suitable methodological tool that will fulfil the prerequisites of an empirical phenomenology. The Multiple Sorting Task (MST) is seen as appropriate in this respect and a description of the principles and procedure of the MST is provided. Examples from the authors' own research are used to illustrate how the MST operates within an empirical-phenomenological research design.

KW - Social Science

KW - Research Design

KW - Common Ground

KW - Empirical Approach

KW - Methodological Tool

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247770774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00134526

DO - 10.1007/BF00134526

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34247770774

VL - 21

SP - 313

EP - 333

JO - Quality and Quantity

JF - Quality and Quantity

SN - 0033-5177

IS - 3

ER -