Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns

Benjamin K. Sovacool, Raphael J. Heffron, Darren McCauley, Andreas Goldthau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All too often, energy policy and technology discussions are limited to the domains of engineering and economics. Many energy consumers, and even analysts and policymakers, confront and frame energy and climate risks in a moral vacuum, rarely incorporating broader social justice concerns. Here, to remedy this gap, we investigate how concepts from justice and ethics can inform energy decision-making by reframing five energy problems — nuclear waste, involuntary resettlement, energy pollution, energy poverty and climate change — as pressing justice concerns. We conclude by proposing an energy justice framework centred on availability, affordability, due process, transparency and accountability, sustainability, equity and responsibility, which highlights the futurity, fairness and equity dimensions of energy production and use.
Original languageEnglish
Article number16024
JournalNature Energy
Volume1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2016

Keywords

  • Carbon and energy
  • Ethics

Cite this

Sovacool, Benjamin K. ; Heffron, Raphael J. ; McCauley, Darren ; Goldthau, Andreas. / Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns. In: Nature Energy. 2016 ; Vol. 1.
@article{8682458e21e748428b24545388c012fa,
title = "Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns",
abstract = "All too often, energy policy and technology discussions are limited to the domains of engineering and economics. Many energy consumers, and even analysts and policymakers, confront and frame energy and climate risks in a moral vacuum, rarely incorporating broader social justice concerns. Here, to remedy this gap, we investigate how concepts from justice and ethics can inform energy decision-making by reframing five energy problems — nuclear waste, involuntary resettlement, energy pollution, energy poverty and climate change — as pressing justice concerns. We conclude by proposing an energy justice framework centred on availability, affordability, due process, transparency and accountability, sustainability, equity and responsibility, which highlights the futurity, fairness and equity dimensions of energy production and use.",
keywords = "Carbon and energy, Ethics",
author = "Sovacool, {Benjamin K.} and Heffron, {Raphael J.} and Darren McCauley and Andreas Goldthau",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1038/NENERGY.2016.24",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Nature Energy",
issn = "2058-7546",
publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns. / Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Heffron, Raphael J.; McCauley, Darren; Goldthau, Andreas.

In: Nature Energy, Vol. 1, 16024, 06.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns

AU - Sovacool, Benjamin K.

AU - Heffron, Raphael J.

AU - McCauley, Darren

AU - Goldthau, Andreas

PY - 2016/5/6

Y1 - 2016/5/6

N2 - All too often, energy policy and technology discussions are limited to the domains of engineering and economics. Many energy consumers, and even analysts and policymakers, confront and frame energy and climate risks in a moral vacuum, rarely incorporating broader social justice concerns. Here, to remedy this gap, we investigate how concepts from justice and ethics can inform energy decision-making by reframing five energy problems — nuclear waste, involuntary resettlement, energy pollution, energy poverty and climate change — as pressing justice concerns. We conclude by proposing an energy justice framework centred on availability, affordability, due process, transparency and accountability, sustainability, equity and responsibility, which highlights the futurity, fairness and equity dimensions of energy production and use.

AB - All too often, energy policy and technology discussions are limited to the domains of engineering and economics. Many energy consumers, and even analysts and policymakers, confront and frame energy and climate risks in a moral vacuum, rarely incorporating broader social justice concerns. Here, to remedy this gap, we investigate how concepts from justice and ethics can inform energy decision-making by reframing five energy problems — nuclear waste, involuntary resettlement, energy pollution, energy poverty and climate change — as pressing justice concerns. We conclude by proposing an energy justice framework centred on availability, affordability, due process, transparency and accountability, sustainability, equity and responsibility, which highlights the futurity, fairness and equity dimensions of energy production and use.

KW - Carbon and energy

KW - Ethics

U2 - 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.24

DO - 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.24

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Nature Energy

JF - Nature Energy

SN - 2058-7546

M1 - 16024

ER -