Energy justice and policy change: An historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out

Darren McCauley (Lead / Corresponding author), Antje Brown, Robert Rehner, Raphael Heffron, Shashi van de Graaff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The German government presented the decision to phase out nuclear energy as a nationally accepted rebalancing of inequality in the energy sector. We expose how this radical change was delivered through a myriad of change agents, most notably through the rise of small energy companies. Critical junctures, in this case the Chernobyl disaster rather than Fukushima, offer moments in time when national policy systems are destabilized. They provide opportunities for changing policy in a perceived pro-energy justice direction if a new consensus can be forged. The paper concludes with a discussion on how energy scholars must engage more with policy analysis frameworks if long-term effective solutions are to be found to persistent energy inequalities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-323
Number of pages7
JournalApplied Energy
Volume228
Early online date27 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Nuclear energy
Disasters
energy
Industry
policy analysis
disaster
policy
justice
analysis

Keywords

  • Energy justice
  • Historical institutionalism
  • Nuclear energy
  • Policy analysis
  • Policy change

Cite this

McCauley, Darren ; Brown, Antje ; Rehner, Robert ; Heffron, Raphael ; van de Graaff, Shashi. / Energy justice and policy change : An historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out. In: Applied Energy. 2018 ; Vol. 228. pp. 317-323.
@article{b2602b2a76464ecfbbc6654b1d31b6f7,
title = "Energy justice and policy change: An historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out",
abstract = "The German government presented the decision to phase out nuclear energy as a nationally accepted rebalancing of inequality in the energy sector. We expose how this radical change was delivered through a myriad of change agents, most notably through the rise of small energy companies. Critical junctures, in this case the Chernobyl disaster rather than Fukushima, offer moments in time when national policy systems are destabilized. They provide opportunities for changing policy in a perceived pro-energy justice direction if a new consensus can be forged. The paper concludes with a discussion on how energy scholars must engage more with policy analysis frameworks if long-term effective solutions are to be found to persistent energy inequalities.",
keywords = "Energy justice, Historical institutionalism, Nuclear energy, Policy analysis, Policy change",
author = "Darren McCauley and Antje Brown and Robert Rehner and Raphael Heffron and {van de Graaff}, Shashi",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.093",
language = "English",
volume = "228",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "Applied Energy",
issn = "0306-2619",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Energy justice and policy change : An historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out. / McCauley, Darren (Lead / Corresponding author); Brown, Antje; Rehner, Robert; Heffron, Raphael; van de Graaff, Shashi.

In: Applied Energy, Vol. 228, 15.10.2018, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy justice and policy change

T2 - An historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out

AU - McCauley, Darren

AU - Brown, Antje

AU - Rehner, Robert

AU - Heffron, Raphael

AU - van de Graaff, Shashi

PY - 2018/10/15

Y1 - 2018/10/15

N2 - The German government presented the decision to phase out nuclear energy as a nationally accepted rebalancing of inequality in the energy sector. We expose how this radical change was delivered through a myriad of change agents, most notably through the rise of small energy companies. Critical junctures, in this case the Chernobyl disaster rather than Fukushima, offer moments in time when national policy systems are destabilized. They provide opportunities for changing policy in a perceived pro-energy justice direction if a new consensus can be forged. The paper concludes with a discussion on how energy scholars must engage more with policy analysis frameworks if long-term effective solutions are to be found to persistent energy inequalities.

AB - The German government presented the decision to phase out nuclear energy as a nationally accepted rebalancing of inequality in the energy sector. We expose how this radical change was delivered through a myriad of change agents, most notably through the rise of small energy companies. Critical junctures, in this case the Chernobyl disaster rather than Fukushima, offer moments in time when national policy systems are destabilized. They provide opportunities for changing policy in a perceived pro-energy justice direction if a new consensus can be forged. The paper concludes with a discussion on how energy scholars must engage more with policy analysis frameworks if long-term effective solutions are to be found to persistent energy inequalities.

KW - Energy justice

KW - Historical institutionalism

KW - Nuclear energy

KW - Policy analysis

KW - Policy change

U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.093

DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.093

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049020401

VL - 228

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - Applied Energy

JF - Applied Energy

SN - 0306-2619

ER -