Energy justice in the Arctic

Implications for energy infrastructural development in the Arctic

Darren McCauley, Raphael Heffron, Maria Pavlenko, Robert Rehner, Ryan Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development of energy infrastructure in the Arctic poses serious far reaching justice based questions for local, regional and international communities. Oil and gas rigs, renewable energy sites, shipping and transportation all force us to reflect on how fair and equitable infrastructural expansion is locally and globally. We examine the justice claims of business, government and civil society in an attempt to understand current problems, and their likely solutions. The results suggest that we need to replace the current stakeholder-centred approach of energy policy, with one based upon justice. A widening of procedural justice to include not only the co-production of decisions, but also knowledge should be complemented with new ways of recognising the vulnerabilities of mis- and under-represented people, as well as exploring the sensitivities around proximity to new energy infrastructures
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-146
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume16
Early online date25 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Keywords

  • Energy justice
  • Arctic
  • Energy infrastructure
  • Due process
  • Vulnerability
  • Proximity

Cite this

McCauley, Darren ; Heffron, Raphael ; Pavlenko, Maria ; Rehner, Robert ; Holmes, Ryan. / Energy justice in the Arctic : Implications for energy infrastructural development in the Arctic. In: Energy Research and Social Science. 2016 ; Vol. 16. pp. 141-146.
@article{5782eaf8c25c4c20b0dd738e7e195a8f,
title = "Energy justice in the Arctic: Implications for energy infrastructural development in the Arctic",
abstract = "The development of energy infrastructure in the Arctic poses serious far reaching justice based questions for local, regional and international communities. Oil and gas rigs, renewable energy sites, shipping and transportation all force us to reflect on how fair and equitable infrastructural expansion is locally and globally. We examine the justice claims of business, government and civil society in an attempt to understand current problems, and their likely solutions. The results suggest that we need to replace the current stakeholder-centred approach of energy policy, with one based upon justice. A widening of procedural justice to include not only the co-production of decisions, but also knowledge should be complemented with new ways of recognising the vulnerabilities of mis- and under-represented people, as well as exploring the sensitivities around proximity to new energy infrastructures",
keywords = "Energy justice, Arctic, Energy infrastructure, Due process, Vulnerability, Proximity",
author = "Darren McCauley and Raphael Heffron and Maria Pavlenko and Robert Rehner and Ryan Holmes",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.019",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "141--146",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

Energy justice in the Arctic : Implications for energy infrastructural development in the Arctic. / McCauley, Darren; Heffron, Raphael; Pavlenko, Maria; Rehner, Robert; Holmes, Ryan.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 16, 06.2016, p. 141-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy justice in the Arctic

T2 - Implications for energy infrastructural development in the Arctic

AU - McCauley, Darren

AU - Heffron, Raphael

AU - Pavlenko, Maria

AU - Rehner, Robert

AU - Holmes, Ryan

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - The development of energy infrastructure in the Arctic poses serious far reaching justice based questions for local, regional and international communities. Oil and gas rigs, renewable energy sites, shipping and transportation all force us to reflect on how fair and equitable infrastructural expansion is locally and globally. We examine the justice claims of business, government and civil society in an attempt to understand current problems, and their likely solutions. The results suggest that we need to replace the current stakeholder-centred approach of energy policy, with one based upon justice. A widening of procedural justice to include not only the co-production of decisions, but also knowledge should be complemented with new ways of recognising the vulnerabilities of mis- and under-represented people, as well as exploring the sensitivities around proximity to new energy infrastructures

AB - The development of energy infrastructure in the Arctic poses serious far reaching justice based questions for local, regional and international communities. Oil and gas rigs, renewable energy sites, shipping and transportation all force us to reflect on how fair and equitable infrastructural expansion is locally and globally. We examine the justice claims of business, government and civil society in an attempt to understand current problems, and their likely solutions. The results suggest that we need to replace the current stakeholder-centred approach of energy policy, with one based upon justice. A widening of procedural justice to include not only the co-production of decisions, but also knowledge should be complemented with new ways of recognising the vulnerabilities of mis- and under-represented people, as well as exploring the sensitivities around proximity to new energy infrastructures

KW - Energy justice

KW - Arctic

KW - Energy infrastructure

KW - Due process

KW - Vulnerability

KW - Proximity

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.019

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.019

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 141

EP - 146

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -