Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research

exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's

Caroline Bradbury-Jones

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aim. This paper is a discussion of the use of a systematic approach to explore researcher subjectivity and how this enhanced the rigour of a qualitative study.

    Background. The need for rigour in qualitative research is widely documented; the means by which it is enhanced are varied and numerous. Although most qualitative health researchers espouse the notion of being aware of their own subjectivity, the methods by which their self-awareness is developed is seldom made explicit.

    Method. This paper draws on the work of Peshkin from the discipline of education, who articulated the need for researchers to identify their subjectivity systematically throughout the course of their research by searching for their subjective I's. I share my experience of adopting this approach by using a reflexive journal as data. I recorded the journal as an integral part of a study in which I explored the meaning of empowerment for nursing students during the period 2005-2006.

    Findings. This systematic approach to exploring my subjectivity revealed four subjective I's that had potential for influence throughout the entire study. I argue that cognisance of my subjective I's improved the trustworthiness of the research.

    Conclusions. I offer this approach for consideration by healthcare researchers as a robust means of illuminating researcher subjectivity. This is not intended as a narcissistic process; it is one that is advocated for use as part of an audit trail as a means of enhancing the rigour of qualitative research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)290-298
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
    Volume59
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

    Fingerprint

    Qualitative Research
    Research Personnel
    Health
    Nursing Students
    Research
    Delivery of Health Care
    Education

    Keywords

    • Credibility
    • Nursing students
    • Peshkin
    • Qualitative approaches
    • Reflexivity
    • Research journal
    • Research methods
    • Rigour
    • Subjectivity

    Cite this

    @article{cad3fbe6f40346ffb7a91f01b9d14e80,
    title = "Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's",
    abstract = "Aim. This paper is a discussion of the use of a systematic approach to explore researcher subjectivity and how this enhanced the rigour of a qualitative study.Background. The need for rigour in qualitative research is widely documented; the means by which it is enhanced are varied and numerous. Although most qualitative health researchers espouse the notion of being aware of their own subjectivity, the methods by which their self-awareness is developed is seldom made explicit.Method. This paper draws on the work of Peshkin from the discipline of education, who articulated the need for researchers to identify their subjectivity systematically throughout the course of their research by searching for their subjective I's. I share my experience of adopting this approach by using a reflexive journal as data. I recorded the journal as an integral part of a study in which I explored the meaning of empowerment for nursing students during the period 2005-2006.Findings. This systematic approach to exploring my subjectivity revealed four subjective I's that had potential for influence throughout the entire study. I argue that cognisance of my subjective I's improved the trustworthiness of the research.Conclusions. I offer this approach for consideration by healthcare researchers as a robust means of illuminating researcher subjectivity. This is not intended as a narcissistic process; it is one that is advocated for use as part of an audit trail as a means of enhancing the rigour of qualitative research.",
    keywords = "Credibility, Nursing students, Peshkin, Qualitative approaches, Reflexivity, Research journal, Research methods, Rigour, Subjectivity",
    author = "Caroline Bradbury-Jones",
    note = "dc.publisher: Blackwell Publishing The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com",
    year = "2007",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "59",
    pages = "290--298",
    journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
    issn = "0309-2402",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "3",

    }

    Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research : exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's. / Bradbury-Jones, Caroline.

    In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 59, No. 3, 08.2007, p. 290-298.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research

    T2 - exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's

    AU - Bradbury-Jones, Caroline

    N1 - dc.publisher: Blackwell Publishing The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com

    PY - 2007/8

    Y1 - 2007/8

    N2 - Aim. This paper is a discussion of the use of a systematic approach to explore researcher subjectivity and how this enhanced the rigour of a qualitative study.Background. The need for rigour in qualitative research is widely documented; the means by which it is enhanced are varied and numerous. Although most qualitative health researchers espouse the notion of being aware of their own subjectivity, the methods by which their self-awareness is developed is seldom made explicit.Method. This paper draws on the work of Peshkin from the discipline of education, who articulated the need for researchers to identify their subjectivity systematically throughout the course of their research by searching for their subjective I's. I share my experience of adopting this approach by using a reflexive journal as data. I recorded the journal as an integral part of a study in which I explored the meaning of empowerment for nursing students during the period 2005-2006.Findings. This systematic approach to exploring my subjectivity revealed four subjective I's that had potential for influence throughout the entire study. I argue that cognisance of my subjective I's improved the trustworthiness of the research.Conclusions. I offer this approach for consideration by healthcare researchers as a robust means of illuminating researcher subjectivity. This is not intended as a narcissistic process; it is one that is advocated for use as part of an audit trail as a means of enhancing the rigour of qualitative research.

    AB - Aim. This paper is a discussion of the use of a systematic approach to explore researcher subjectivity and how this enhanced the rigour of a qualitative study.Background. The need for rigour in qualitative research is widely documented; the means by which it is enhanced are varied and numerous. Although most qualitative health researchers espouse the notion of being aware of their own subjectivity, the methods by which their self-awareness is developed is seldom made explicit.Method. This paper draws on the work of Peshkin from the discipline of education, who articulated the need for researchers to identify their subjectivity systematically throughout the course of their research by searching for their subjective I's. I share my experience of adopting this approach by using a reflexive journal as data. I recorded the journal as an integral part of a study in which I explored the meaning of empowerment for nursing students during the period 2005-2006.Findings. This systematic approach to exploring my subjectivity revealed four subjective I's that had potential for influence throughout the entire study. I argue that cognisance of my subjective I's improved the trustworthiness of the research.Conclusions. I offer this approach for consideration by healthcare researchers as a robust means of illuminating researcher subjectivity. This is not intended as a narcissistic process; it is one that is advocated for use as part of an audit trail as a means of enhancing the rigour of qualitative research.

    KW - Credibility

    KW - Nursing students

    KW - Peshkin

    KW - Qualitative approaches

    KW - Reflexivity

    KW - Research journal

    KW - Research methods

    KW - Rigour

    KW - Subjectivity

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 59

    SP - 290

    EP - 298

    JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

    JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

    SN - 0309-2402

    IS - 3

    ER -