Evaluating the effectiveness and reliability of the Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge auditory implants in clinical practice: Study design and methods for a multi-centre longitudinal observational study

Deborah Vickers, Angela Canas, Aneeka Degun, John Briggs, Mina Bingham, Joseph Toner, Huw Cooper, Sarah Rogers, Stacey Cooper, Richard Irving, Patrick Spielman, Samantha Batty, Stephen Jones, Abi Asher, Mark Chung, Neil Donnelly, Anna Skibinska, Robert Gardner, Chris Raine, Rachel AndrewKevin Green, Hashmat Ghulam, Terry Nunn, Dan Jiang, Severin Fürhapter, Michael Urban, Kate Hanvey, Sarah Flynn, David Lovegrove, Shakeel Saeed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
191 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant and the Bonebridge bone conducting hearing device are hearing implants that use radio frequency transmission to send information from the sound processor to the internal transducer. This reduces the risk of skin problems and infection but requires a more involved surgical procedure than competitor skin penetrating devices. It is not known whether more complex surgery will lead to additional complications. There is little information available on the reliability of these systems and adverse medical or surgical events. The primary research question is to determine the reliability and complication rate for the Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge. The secondary research question explores changes in quality of life following implantation of the devices. The tertiary research question looks at effectiveness via changes in auditory performance.

Method: The study was designed based on a combination of a literature search, two clinician focus groups and expert review. A multi-centre longitudinal observational study was designed. There are three study groups, two will have been implanted prior to the start of the study and one group, the prospective group, will be implanted after initiation of the study. Outcomes are surgical questionnaires, measures of quality of life, user satisfaction and speech perception tests in quiet and in noise.

Conclusion: This is the first multi-centre study to look at these interventions and includes follow up over time to understand effectiveness, reliability, quality of life and complications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137 - 140
Number of pages4
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Volume10
Early online date15 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Bone conducting device
  • Bonebridge
  • Implant registry
  • Middle ear implant
  • Quality of life
  • Soundbridge

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the effectiveness and reliability of the Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge auditory implants in clinical practice: Study design and methods for a multi-centre longitudinal observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this