Evaluation of Craniofacial Care Outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment

Isabella Lopes Monlleo, Peter Anthony Mossey, Vera Lucia Gil-da-Silva-Lopes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To describe health care provided outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment, and to inform the debate about craniofacial health care policy in Brazil.

    Design: Observational, retrospective cohort.

    Methods: Craniofacial care providers completed the same questionnaire previously used to evaluate the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment (RRTDCF).

    Results: Units outside the RRTDCF are mainly located in the southeast region of Brazil and in universities. They comprise 56 independent clinics, 22 combined clinics, and four parental associations. Services provided are variable from unit to unit and just six of them meet the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association minimum team standard. Genetic evaluation and counseling is provided by clinical geneticists in 35 units; whereas, in 30 units, it is undertaken by untrained professionals.

    Conclusion: A significant number of craniofacial units work in parallel and overlap the RRTDCF. They are funded by the government but not recognized as craniofacial teams. Regional disparities and lack of coordination within and between cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) teams are unsolved problems. Non-RRTDCF units are heterogeneous concerning configuration, service provided, areas of treatment, and composition of the teams. A nationwide and voluntary database on orofacial clefts is a proposed strategy to address some of these problems. Anticipated benefits include strengthening the collaboration within and between healthcare teams and supplying health authorities with a comprehensive and population-specific source of information on this prevalent and potentially preventable group of birth defects.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)204-211
    Number of pages8
    JournalCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
    Volume46
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

    Keywords

    • craniofacial anomalies care
    • craniofacial anomalies health policy
    • CLEFT-PALATE
    • ORGANIZATION
    • PROJECT
    • LIP

    Cite this

    @article{175fa61b57f34cd89fc776297837e82b,
    title = "Evaluation of Craniofacial Care Outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment",
    abstract = "Objective: To describe health care provided outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment, and to inform the debate about craniofacial health care policy in Brazil.Design: Observational, retrospective cohort.Methods: Craniofacial care providers completed the same questionnaire previously used to evaluate the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment (RRTDCF).Results: Units outside the RRTDCF are mainly located in the southeast region of Brazil and in universities. They comprise 56 independent clinics, 22 combined clinics, and four parental associations. Services provided are variable from unit to unit and just six of them meet the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association minimum team standard. Genetic evaluation and counseling is provided by clinical geneticists in 35 units; whereas, in 30 units, it is undertaken by untrained professionals.Conclusion: A significant number of craniofacial units work in parallel and overlap the RRTDCF. They are funded by the government but not recognized as craniofacial teams. Regional disparities and lack of coordination within and between cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) teams are unsolved problems. Non-RRTDCF units are heterogeneous concerning configuration, service provided, areas of treatment, and composition of the teams. A nationwide and voluntary database on orofacial clefts is a proposed strategy to address some of these problems. Anticipated benefits include strengthening the collaboration within and between healthcare teams and supplying health authorities with a comprehensive and population-specific source of information on this prevalent and potentially preventable group of birth defects.",
    keywords = "craniofacial anomalies care, craniofacial anomalies health policy, CLEFT-PALATE, ORGANIZATION, PROJECT, LIP",
    author = "Monlleo, {Isabella Lopes} and Mossey, {Peter Anthony} and Gil-da-Silva-Lopes, {Vera Lucia}",
    year = "2009",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1597/07-153.1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "46",
    pages = "204--211",
    journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
    issn = "1055-6656",
    publisher = "American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association",
    number = "2",

    }

    Evaluation of Craniofacial Care Outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment. / Monlleo, Isabella Lopes; Mossey, Peter Anthony; Gil-da-Silva-Lopes, Vera Lucia.

    In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Vol. 46, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 204-211.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evaluation of Craniofacial Care Outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment

    AU - Monlleo, Isabella Lopes

    AU - Mossey, Peter Anthony

    AU - Gil-da-Silva-Lopes, Vera Lucia

    PY - 2009/3

    Y1 - 2009/3

    N2 - Objective: To describe health care provided outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment, and to inform the debate about craniofacial health care policy in Brazil.Design: Observational, retrospective cohort.Methods: Craniofacial care providers completed the same questionnaire previously used to evaluate the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment (RRTDCF).Results: Units outside the RRTDCF are mainly located in the southeast region of Brazil and in universities. They comprise 56 independent clinics, 22 combined clinics, and four parental associations. Services provided are variable from unit to unit and just six of them meet the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association minimum team standard. Genetic evaluation and counseling is provided by clinical geneticists in 35 units; whereas, in 30 units, it is undertaken by untrained professionals.Conclusion: A significant number of craniofacial units work in parallel and overlap the RRTDCF. They are funded by the government but not recognized as craniofacial teams. Regional disparities and lack of coordination within and between cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) teams are unsolved problems. Non-RRTDCF units are heterogeneous concerning configuration, service provided, areas of treatment, and composition of the teams. A nationwide and voluntary database on orofacial clefts is a proposed strategy to address some of these problems. Anticipated benefits include strengthening the collaboration within and between healthcare teams and supplying health authorities with a comprehensive and population-specific source of information on this prevalent and potentially preventable group of birth defects.

    AB - Objective: To describe health care provided outside the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment, and to inform the debate about craniofacial health care policy in Brazil.Design: Observational, retrospective cohort.Methods: Craniofacial care providers completed the same questionnaire previously used to evaluate the Brazilian Reference Network for Craniofacial Treatment (RRTDCF).Results: Units outside the RRTDCF are mainly located in the southeast region of Brazil and in universities. They comprise 56 independent clinics, 22 combined clinics, and four parental associations. Services provided are variable from unit to unit and just six of them meet the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association minimum team standard. Genetic evaluation and counseling is provided by clinical geneticists in 35 units; whereas, in 30 units, it is undertaken by untrained professionals.Conclusion: A significant number of craniofacial units work in parallel and overlap the RRTDCF. They are funded by the government but not recognized as craniofacial teams. Regional disparities and lack of coordination within and between cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) teams are unsolved problems. Non-RRTDCF units are heterogeneous concerning configuration, service provided, areas of treatment, and composition of the teams. A nationwide and voluntary database on orofacial clefts is a proposed strategy to address some of these problems. Anticipated benefits include strengthening the collaboration within and between healthcare teams and supplying health authorities with a comprehensive and population-specific source of information on this prevalent and potentially preventable group of birth defects.

    KW - craniofacial anomalies care

    KW - craniofacial anomalies health policy

    KW - CLEFT-PALATE

    KW - ORGANIZATION

    KW - PROJECT

    KW - LIP

    U2 - 10.1597/07-153.1

    DO - 10.1597/07-153.1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 46

    SP - 204

    EP - 211

    JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

    JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

    SN - 1055-6656

    IS - 2

    ER -