Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Dundee Discovery Portal Home
Search content at University of Dundee Discovery Portal
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research Outputs
Projects
Datasets
Theses
Activity
Press/Media
Research Facilities
Prizes
Evaluation of the Alcohol Improvement Programme: Final Report
Betsy Thom
, S. MacGregor (Lead / Corresponding author)
, Rachel Herring
, Jordan Tchilingirian
, Christine Godfrey
, Charlie Lloyd
,
Paul Toner
Health Sciences
Research output
:
Book/Report
›
Commissioned report
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the Alcohol Improvement Programme: Final Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Alcohol
100%
Improvement Program
100%
Hospital Admission
37%
Structured Interview
25%
Local Context
25%
Process Evaluation
25%
Delivery System
25%
Programming Model
25%
Stakeholder Meetings
25%
Case Study Area
25%
Politicians
12%
Support System
12%
Social Groups
12%
Treatment Strategy
12%
Effective Implementation
12%
Academic-practice Partnership
12%
Regional Variation
12%
Deprived Areas
12%
Cost-effectiveness
12%
Feedback Sessions
12%
Service Structure
12%
Public Awareness
12%
Differential Effects
12%
Evaluation Framework
12%
Local Stakeholders
12%
Impact Assessment
12%
Health Priorities
12%
Brief Advice
12%
Patchy
12%
Alcohol-related Harm
12%
Alcohol Problems
12%
Telephone Survey
12%
Reality Check
12%
Access to Treatment
12%
Local Area
12%
Process Outcomes
12%
Alcohol Treatment
12%
Theory-based Evaluation
12%
Stakeholder Consultation
12%
Program Components
12%
Alcohol Availability
12%
Local Feedback
12%
Local Interests
12%
Local Health
12%
Alcohol-related
12%
Policy Effect
12%
Process Impact
12%
Social Sciences
Semi-Structured Interview
100%
Social Class
50%
Quantitative Method
50%
Regional Variation
50%
Target Groups
50%
Theoretical Approach
50%
Effective Implementation
50%
Qualitative Method
50%
Telephone
50%
Medicine and Dentistry
Health Care Cost
100%
Awareness
33%
Social Group
33%
Impact Evaluation
33%
Mixed Methods
33%
Nursing and Health Professions
Health Care Planning
100%
Social Class
100%