TY - JOUR
T1 - Everyday participation and cultural value in place
AU - Miles, Andrew
AU - Gibson, Lisanne
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Arts and Humanities Research Council Connected Communities Large Project funding under Grant number AH/J005401/1; additional funding to support the research carried out in Scotland was provided by Creative Scotland.
PY - 2017/1/2
Y1 - 2017/1/2
N2 - In the introduction to the first part of this special issue (Miles & Gibson, 2016), we outlined the rationale and focus of the Understanding Everyday Participation – Articulating Cultural Values (UEP) project. Here, we drew particular attention to the relative neglect of location and “place” in recent work on the dynamics and meanings of cultural participation. This, we suggested, is partly the product of the dominance of sample survey methodology, which typically represents cultural participation as a limited set of activities while simultaneously reifying the “national” as the appropriate scale on which participation should be understood.
AB - In the introduction to the first part of this special issue (Miles & Gibson, 2016), we outlined the rationale and focus of the Understanding Everyday Participation – Articulating Cultural Values (UEP) project. Here, we drew particular attention to the relative neglect of location and “place” in recent work on the dynamics and meanings of cultural participation. This, we suggested, is partly the product of the dominance of sample survey methodology, which typically represents cultural participation as a limited set of activities while simultaneously reifying the “national” as the appropriate scale on which participation should be understood.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012173117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09548963.2017.1275129
DO - 10.1080/09548963.2017.1275129
M3 - Editorial
AN - SCOPUS:85012173117
SN - 0954-8963
VL - 26
SP - 1
EP - 3
JO - Cultural Trends
JF - Cultural Trends
IS - 1
ER -