Evidence-based anatomical review areas derived from systematic analysis of cases from a radiological departmental discrepancy meeting

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based anatomical review areas derived from systematic analysis of cases from a radiological departmental discrepancy meeting

AU - Chin, S. C.

AU - Weir-McCall, J. R.

AU - Yeap, P. M.

AU - White, R. D.

AU - Budak, M. J.

AU - Duncan, G.

AU - Oliver, T. B.

AU - Zealley, I. A.

N1 - No funding info

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Aim: To produce short checklists of specific anatomical review sites for different regions of the body based on the frequency of radiological errors reviewed at radiology discrepancy meetings, thereby creating "evidence-based" review areas for radiology reporting.Materials and Methods: A single centre discrepancy database was retrospectively reviewed from a 5-year period. All errors were classified by type, modality, body system, and specific anatomical location. Errors were assigned to one of four body regions: chest, abdominopelvic, central nervous system (CNS), and musculoskeletal (MSK). Frequencies of errors in anatomical locations were then analysed.Results: There were 561 errors in 477 examinations; 290 (46%) errors occurred in the abdomen/pelvis, 99 (15.7%) in the chest, 117 (18.5%) in the CNS, and 125 (19.9%) in the MSK system. In each body system, the five most common location were chest: lung bases on computed tomography (CT), apices on radiography, pulmonary vasculature, bones, and mediastinum; abdominopelvic: vasculature, colon, kidneys, liver, and pancreas; CNS: intracranial vasculature, peripheral cerebral grey matter, bone, parafalcine, and the frontotemporal lobes surrounding the Sylvian fissure; and MSK: calvarium, sacrum, pelvis, chest, and spine.Conclusion: The five listed locations accounted for >50% of all perceptual errors suggesting an avenue for focused review at the end of reporting.

AB - Aim: To produce short checklists of specific anatomical review sites for different regions of the body based on the frequency of radiological errors reviewed at radiology discrepancy meetings, thereby creating "evidence-based" review areas for radiology reporting.Materials and Methods: A single centre discrepancy database was retrospectively reviewed from a 5-year period. All errors were classified by type, modality, body system, and specific anatomical location. Errors were assigned to one of four body regions: chest, abdominopelvic, central nervous system (CNS), and musculoskeletal (MSK). Frequencies of errors in anatomical locations were then analysed.Results: There were 561 errors in 477 examinations; 290 (46%) errors occurred in the abdomen/pelvis, 99 (15.7%) in the chest, 117 (18.5%) in the CNS, and 125 (19.9%) in the MSK system. In each body system, the five most common location were chest: lung bases on computed tomography (CT), apices on radiography, pulmonary vasculature, bones, and mediastinum; abdominopelvic: vasculature, colon, kidneys, liver, and pancreas; CNS: intracranial vasculature, peripheral cerebral grey matter, bone, parafalcine, and the frontotemporal lobes surrounding the Sylvian fissure; and MSK: calvarium, sacrum, pelvis, chest, and spine.Conclusion: The five listed locations accounted for >50% of all perceptual errors suggesting an avenue for focused review at the end of reporting.

U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 28687168

SN - 0009-9260

VL - 72

SP - 902.e1-902.e12

JO - Clinical Radiology

JF - Clinical Radiology

IS - 10

ER -