Exploring ourselves: Exploiting and resisting gendered identities of women academics in accounting and management

Kathryn Haynes, Anne Fearfull

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose – The aim of this paper is to examine gendered identities of women academics by exploring the interplay and exploitation of internal and external, personal and academic, identities. The paper also considers the relative prioritisation of the three main academic activities of teaching, research, and administration, in which an enhanced emphasis on research performance, as opposed to teaching and administration, is what is often deemed to represent “success” in academia.

    Design/methodology/approach – Drawing on autoethnographical detail, the paper reflects on the complexities of identities as they are constructed, developed, experienced and understood both by themselves and by others. By presenting several short autobiographical vignettes, the paper examines perceptions of the gendered identity of women in academia as caring, “motherly” and nurturing, and demonstrates attempts to exploit so-called “natural” feminine, mothering traits as a means of fulfilling the pastoral and administrative components of universities.

    Findings – In considering such stereotypes, the paper addresses examples of their self-fulfilment, whilst considering how academic structures and practices also impose such distinctions, in a context where academic “success” is often typified by research, publications and academic networking.

    Originality/value – The paper considers both possibilities for resistance and the negative implications for the career success of women academics, arguing that, until these gendered stereotypes are challenged, women academics will continue to be disadvantaged within academic institutions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)185 - 204
    JournalPacific Accounting Review
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Stereotypes
    Mothering
    Career success
    Networking
    Exploitation
    Vignettes
    Prioritization
    Research performance
    Design methodology

    Cite this

    @article{46d788dcbd2e42f1978ba2d2fb487933,
    title = "Exploring ourselves:: Exploiting and resisting gendered identities of women academics in accounting and management",
    abstract = "Purpose – The aim of this paper is to examine gendered identities of women academics by exploring the interplay and exploitation of internal and external, personal and academic, identities. The paper also considers the relative prioritisation of the three main academic activities of teaching, research, and administration, in which an enhanced emphasis on research performance, as opposed to teaching and administration, is what is often deemed to represent “success” in academia.Design/methodology/approach – Drawing on autoethnographical detail, the paper reflects on the complexities of identities as they are constructed, developed, experienced and understood both by themselves and by others. By presenting several short autobiographical vignettes, the paper examines perceptions of the gendered identity of women in academia as caring, “motherly” and nurturing, and demonstrates attempts to exploit so-called “natural” feminine, mothering traits as a means of fulfilling the pastoral and administrative components of universities.Findings – In considering such stereotypes, the paper addresses examples of their self-fulfilment, whilst considering how academic structures and practices also impose such distinctions, in a context where academic “success” is often typified by research, publications and academic networking.Originality/value – The paper considers both possibilities for resistance and the negative implications for the career success of women academics, arguing that, until these gendered stereotypes are challenged, women academics will continue to be disadvantaged within academic institutions.",
    author = "Kathryn Haynes and Anne Fearfull",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.1108/01140580810892508",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "185 -- 204",
    journal = "Pacific Accounting Review",
    issn = "0114-0582",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    number = "2",

    }

    Exploring ourselves: Exploiting and resisting gendered identities of women academics in accounting and management. / Haynes, Kathryn ; Fearfull, Anne.

    In: Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2008, p. 185 - 204.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Exploring ourselves:

    T2 - Exploiting and resisting gendered identities of women academics in accounting and management

    AU - Haynes, Kathryn

    AU - Fearfull, Anne

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Purpose – The aim of this paper is to examine gendered identities of women academics by exploring the interplay and exploitation of internal and external, personal and academic, identities. The paper also considers the relative prioritisation of the three main academic activities of teaching, research, and administration, in which an enhanced emphasis on research performance, as opposed to teaching and administration, is what is often deemed to represent “success” in academia.Design/methodology/approach – Drawing on autoethnographical detail, the paper reflects on the complexities of identities as they are constructed, developed, experienced and understood both by themselves and by others. By presenting several short autobiographical vignettes, the paper examines perceptions of the gendered identity of women in academia as caring, “motherly” and nurturing, and demonstrates attempts to exploit so-called “natural” feminine, mothering traits as a means of fulfilling the pastoral and administrative components of universities.Findings – In considering such stereotypes, the paper addresses examples of their self-fulfilment, whilst considering how academic structures and practices also impose such distinctions, in a context where academic “success” is often typified by research, publications and academic networking.Originality/value – The paper considers both possibilities for resistance and the negative implications for the career success of women academics, arguing that, until these gendered stereotypes are challenged, women academics will continue to be disadvantaged within academic institutions.

    AB - Purpose – The aim of this paper is to examine gendered identities of women academics by exploring the interplay and exploitation of internal and external, personal and academic, identities. The paper also considers the relative prioritisation of the three main academic activities of teaching, research, and administration, in which an enhanced emphasis on research performance, as opposed to teaching and administration, is what is often deemed to represent “success” in academia.Design/methodology/approach – Drawing on autoethnographical detail, the paper reflects on the complexities of identities as they are constructed, developed, experienced and understood both by themselves and by others. By presenting several short autobiographical vignettes, the paper examines perceptions of the gendered identity of women in academia as caring, “motherly” and nurturing, and demonstrates attempts to exploit so-called “natural” feminine, mothering traits as a means of fulfilling the pastoral and administrative components of universities.Findings – In considering such stereotypes, the paper addresses examples of their self-fulfilment, whilst considering how academic structures and practices also impose such distinctions, in a context where academic “success” is often typified by research, publications and academic networking.Originality/value – The paper considers both possibilities for resistance and the negative implications for the career success of women academics, arguing that, until these gendered stereotypes are challenged, women academics will continue to be disadvantaged within academic institutions.

    U2 - 10.1108/01140580810892508

    DO - 10.1108/01140580810892508

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 185

    EP - 204

    JO - Pacific Accounting Review

    JF - Pacific Accounting Review

    SN - 0114-0582

    IS - 2

    ER -