Abstract
Background: Interprofessional co-debriefing (ICPD) is increasingly used in simulation-based education, yet little is known about the sociocultural dynamics shaping faculty experience. This study explored how faculty experiences IPCD and how hierarchy is perceived and navigated. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 30 UK-based simulation educators experienced in IPCD. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by constructivist and constructionist paradigms. Results: Four themes were identified: hierarchy, relationships, legitimizing inclusion, and faculty development. IPCD was perceived as valuable but effortful, with benefits contingent on relational trust and active management of hierarchy and voice. Conclusion: IPCD represents a negotiated social practice whose value depends on how intentionally it is designed, supported and enacted within local contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101963 |
| Journal | Clinical Simulation in Nursing |
| Volume | 115 |
| Early online date | 27 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2026 |
Keywords
- Co-debriefing
- Co-facilitation
- Debriefing
- Hierarchy
- Interprofessional
- Qualitative
- Simulation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Modelling and Simulation
- Nursing (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Faculty experiences and perceptions of interprofessional co-debriefing: An exploratory qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver