Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Faculty experiences and perceptions of interprofessional co-debriefing: An exploratory qualitative study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional co-debriefing (ICPD) is increasingly used in simulation-based education, yet little is known about the sociocultural dynamics shaping faculty experience. This study explored how faculty experiences IPCD and how hierarchy is perceived and navigated. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 30 UK-based simulation educators experienced in IPCD. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by constructivist and constructionist paradigms. Results: Four themes were identified: hierarchy, relationships, legitimizing inclusion, and faculty development. IPCD was perceived as valuable but effortful, with benefits contingent on relational trust and active management of hierarchy and voice. Conclusion: IPCD represents a negotiated social practice whose value depends on how intentionally it is designed, supported and enacted within local contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101963
JournalClinical Simulation in Nursing
Volume115
Early online date27 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Co-debriefing
  • Co-facilitation
  • Debriefing
  • Hierarchy
  • Interprofessional
  • Qualitative
  • Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Faculty experiences and perceptions of interprofessional co-debriefing: An exploratory qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this