Fidelity comparison of phase masks for hybrid imaging

Tom Vettenburg; Andy Wood; Nicholas Bustin; Andrew R. Harvey

Fidelity comparison of phase masks for hybrid imaging

Tom Vettenburg, Andy Wood, Nicholas Bustin, Andrew R. Harvey

Physics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Optical-digital hybrids are able to increase defocus tolerance; however, choosing the optimal pupil phase modulation is non-trivial. We show how hybrid imaging fidelity can be predicted and compare some of the most common phase-functions.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	International Optical Design Conference, IODC 2010
Publication status	Published - 2010
Event	International Optical Design Conference, IODC 2010 - Jackson Hole, WY, United States Duration: 13 Jun 2010 → 17 Jun 2010

Publication series

Name	Optics InfoBase Conference Papers
ISSN (Electronic)	2162-2701

Conference

Conference	International Optical Design Conference, IODC 2010
Country/Territory	United States
City	Jackson Hole, WY
Period	13/06/10 → 17/06/10

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Instrumentation
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Cite this

@inproceedings{ff2f1933766f4c67b7a20cbd0c8e6771,

title = "Fidelity comparison of phase masks for hybrid imaging",

abstract = "Optical-digital hybrids are able to increase defocus tolerance; however, choosing the optimal pupil phase modulation is non-trivial. We show how hybrid imaging fidelity can be predicted and compare some of the most common phase-functions.",

author = "Tom Vettenburg and Andy Wood and Nicholas Bustin and Harvey, {Andrew R.}",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781557528933",

series = "Optics InfoBase Conference Papers",

booktitle = "International Optical Design Conference, IODC 2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Fidelity comparison of phase masks for hybrid imaging

AU - Vettenburg, Tom

AU - Wood, Andy

AU - Bustin, Nicholas

AU - Harvey, Andrew R.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Optical-digital hybrids are able to increase defocus tolerance; however, choosing the optimal pupil phase modulation is non-trivial. We show how hybrid imaging fidelity can be predicted and compare some of the most common phase-functions.

AB - Optical-digital hybrids are able to increase defocus tolerance; however, choosing the optimal pupil phase modulation is non-trivial. We show how hybrid imaging fidelity can be predicted and compare some of the most common phase-functions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896750569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?uri=IODC-2010-ITuB4

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84896750569

SN - 9781557528933

T3 - Optics InfoBase Conference Papers

BT - International Optical Design Conference, IODC 2010

T2 - International Optical Design Conference, IODC 2010

Y2 - 13 June 2010 through 17 June 2010

ER -

Fidelity comparison of phase masks for hybrid imaging

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this