Abstract
Human beings it seems are “pattern searchers”, (Kraft,K.p276), we are constantly seeking the order and harmony that pattern provides and we use ‘it’ to make sense of the world.
This session will outline a recent pilot study that explored how we perceive surface patterns (ranging from ordered to disordered) in both a static and dynamic state and their impact on our senses. Specifically how pattern transforms sensory impulses through visual perception into emotional responses (the psychophysical).
Visual perception theories discussed at the start of the 20th C. by the Gestalt Psychology movement (a movement in experimental psychology) are still relevant today. Gestaltists believe that when we see we perceive our environment as organised patterns and forms rather than unorganised smaller parts and that our brain interprets our view by grouping elements together in order to make sense of them. These grouping theories of proximity, similarity, closure and simplicity have made an enormous contribution to our understanding of visual perception as they explain the relevance of groups to visual harmony.
Throughout our lives we are constantly exposed to pattern, but our awareness and therefore our responses to it varies from a conscious to subconscious level. Some patterns have the ability to grab our attention and make us take notice while others do not.
This pilot study is based on the theories of psychologist David Canter who explains how we respond to visual information in the form of pattern in what he calls our ‘arousal curve’. He argues that responses to pattern form a bell curve from non-engaging to over stimulating. This is significant as we look at the various functions of surface pattern:
• camouflage to disguise or blend in
• contrast to stand out, appear strong or confident
• decoration and ornamentation to attract, give pleasure or aesthetic satisfaction
There is a tendency in commercial pattern design to remain within the ‘comfort zone’ and this constant exposure to one area on the arousal curve may be having a numbing effect on our senses causing pattern to become almost meaningless in an emotional context and lack value in itself.
This pilot study identifies ways in which we can explore all areas on the arousal curve and examine what types of patterns are associated with disinterest or boredom, excitement, fear and overload. The emotional consequences of static and dynamic patterns and their potential uses will also be explored.
This session will outline a recent pilot study that explored how we perceive surface patterns (ranging from ordered to disordered) in both a static and dynamic state and their impact on our senses. Specifically how pattern transforms sensory impulses through visual perception into emotional responses (the psychophysical).
Visual perception theories discussed at the start of the 20th C. by the Gestalt Psychology movement (a movement in experimental psychology) are still relevant today. Gestaltists believe that when we see we perceive our environment as organised patterns and forms rather than unorganised smaller parts and that our brain interprets our view by grouping elements together in order to make sense of them. These grouping theories of proximity, similarity, closure and simplicity have made an enormous contribution to our understanding of visual perception as they explain the relevance of groups to visual harmony.
Throughout our lives we are constantly exposed to pattern, but our awareness and therefore our responses to it varies from a conscious to subconscious level. Some patterns have the ability to grab our attention and make us take notice while others do not.
This pilot study is based on the theories of psychologist David Canter who explains how we respond to visual information in the form of pattern in what he calls our ‘arousal curve’. He argues that responses to pattern form a bell curve from non-engaging to over stimulating. This is significant as we look at the various functions of surface pattern:
• camouflage to disguise or blend in
• contrast to stand out, appear strong or confident
• decoration and ornamentation to attract, give pleasure or aesthetic satisfaction
There is a tendency in commercial pattern design to remain within the ‘comfort zone’ and this constant exposure to one area on the arousal curve may be having a numbing effect on our senses causing pattern to become almost meaningless in an emotional context and lack value in itself.
This pilot study identifies ways in which we can explore all areas on the arousal curve and examine what types of patterns are associated with disinterest or boredom, excitement, fear and overload. The emotional consequences of static and dynamic patterns and their potential uses will also be explored.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | EAD 07 conference proceedings |
| Subtitle of host publication | dancing with disorder: design, discourse, disaster |
| Place of Publication | Turkey |
| Publisher | Izmir University of Economics |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789758789214 |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
| Event | 7th International Conference of the European Academy of Design: Dancing with disorder - Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey Duration: 11 Apr 2007 → 13 Apr 2007 http://fadf.ieu.edu.tr/ead07/introduction1.html |
Conference
| Conference | 7th International Conference of the European Academy of Design: Dancing with disorder |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | EAD2007 |
| Country/Territory | Turkey |
| City | Izmir |
| Period | 11/04/07 → 13/04/07 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From the Universal to the Particular: Emotional Responses to Pattern'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Paper
-
From the Universal to the Particular: Emotional Responses to Pattern
Stevenson, F., 11 May 2007. 15 p.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver