Gadflies biting science communication: engagement, tricksters and ambivalence online

Jonathan Mendel, Huake Riesch

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    208 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Large-scale online science communication and engagement projects can assume an overly ordered and sterile type of online public space or civil society. Against this, the paper offers a vision of more carnivalesque spaces for online science communication and engagement. Participants in these spaces taking the role of tricksters disrupting the status quo might offer new opportunities for engagement, play and politics online: the online public sphere for discussing science is broken, and we should look for ways to break it better. Acknowledging the limitations of a trickster-like approach, we also consider the ambivalence inherent in carnivalesque play as engagement practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)673-684
    Number of pages14
    JournalScience Communication
    Volume39
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2017

    Keywords

    • blogging
    • Internet
    • tricksters
    • trolling
    • ambivalence
    • agenda setting

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gadflies biting science communication: engagement, tricksters and ambivalence online'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this