Getting our ducks in a row: The need for data utility comparisons of healthcare systems data for clinical trials

Matthew R Sydes (Lead / Corresponding author), Macey L Murray, Saiam Ahmed, Sophia Apostolidou, Judith M Bliss, Claire Bloomfield, Rebecca Cannings-John, James Carpenter, Tim Clayton, Madeleine Clout, Rebecca Cosgriff, Amanda J. Farrin, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Duncan C. Gilbert, Charlie Harper, Nicholas D. James, Ruth E. Langley, Sarah Lessels, Fiona Lugg-Widger, Isla S. MackenzieMarion Mafham, Usha Menon, Harriet Mintz, Heather Pinches, Michael Robling, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Victoria Yorke-Edwards, Sharon B. Love

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Better use of healthcare systems data, collected as part of interactions between patients and the healthcare system, could transform planning and conduct of randomised controlled trials. Multiple challenges to widespread use include whether healthcare systems data captures sufficiently well the data traditionally captured on case report forms. "Data Utility Comparison Studies" (DUCkS) assess the utility of healthcare systems data for RCTs by comparison to data collected by the trial. Despite their importance, there are few published UK examples of DUCkS.

    METHODS-AND-RESULTS: Building from ongoing and selected recent examples of UK-led DUCkS in the literature, we set out experience-based considerations for the conduct of future DUCkS. Developed through informal iterative discussions in many forums, considerations are offered for planning, protocol development, data, analysis and reporting, with comparisons at "patient-level" or "trial-level", depending on the item of interest and trial status.

    DISCUSSION: DUCkS could be a valuable tool in assessing where healthcare systems data can be used for trials and in which trial teams can play a leading role. There is a pressing need for trials to be more efficient in their delivery and research waste must be reduced. Trials have been making inconsistent use of healthcare systems data, not least because of an absence of evidence of utility. DUCkS can also help to identify challenges in using healthcare systems data, such as linkage (access and timing) and data quality. We encourage trial teams to incorporate and report DUCkS in trials and funders and data providers to support them.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number107514
    Number of pages8
    JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
    Volume141
    Early online date26 Mar 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

    Keywords

    • Healthcare systems data
    • Health policy
    • Routinely-collected healthcare data
    • Electronic health records
    • Real world data
    • Routinely-collected data
    • RCTs
    • Data utility
    • Data utility comparison studies
    • DUCkS

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Getting our ducks in a row: The need for data utility comparisons of healthcare systems data for clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this