Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law

H. Van Asselt, F. Sindico, M.A. Mehling

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    51 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Born into the wider body of international law, the climate regime needs to be understood in light of preexisting regimes. By drawing on the current debate about fragmentation in international law, this article highlights challenges for international lawyers and policymakers in navigating the relationship between the climate regime and the biodiversity regime, and the relationship between the climate regime and the multilateral trading system. This article concludes that a narrow focus on conflicts misrepresents the multifaceted nature of climate change and precludes an adequate jurisprudential understanding of the relationship between the climate regime and other regimes. An improved understanding, particularly with respect to interactions with the biodiversity regime, requires a broadening of the debate that takes account of the institutional aspects of these relationships that may allow enhanced political cooperation and coordination. Further, international law, and in particular the emerging concept of systemic integration, has the potential to make a positive contribution to the climate-trade interplay.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)423-449
    Number of pages27
    JournalLaw and Policy
    Volume30
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this