Glorifying national identification increases schadenfreude about asylum seekers when they are a threat, not entitled to seek asylum, and blamed for their adversity

Mariëtte Berndsen (Lead / Corresponding author), Emma F. Thomas, Craig McGarty, Ana-Maria Bliuc, Daniela Muntele Hendres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the current research is to explore how mode of identification (glorification versus attachment) results in either schadenfreude “with a bad conscience” (S-BC) about disadvantaged people, or prosocial emotional responses (sympathy and guilt) towards them through appraisals of entitlement, realistic threat, and blame. These relationships were investigated amongst Australians (N = 213) and Romanians (N = 210) in relation to the treatment of asylum seekers in detention centres in those two countries. Consistent with hypotheses, Australian glorifying identifiers considered asylum seekers to be a threat to well-being and to not be entitled to seek asylum. Asylum seekers were therefore blamed for their situation in detention centres and this enhanced group-based S-BC. Very different findings were observed for attached identifiers who expressed group-based sympathy and guilt towards asylum seekers. Similar pathways were observed in the Romanian sample except for the role of entitlement. Moreover, S-BC and related constructs were relatively strong in the Australian sample. The findings are important because they point to the foundations of group-based S-BC. Findings are discussed in relation to the current scale of the global refugee crisis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-198
Number of pages33
JournalComprehensive Results in Social Psychology
Volume2
Issue number2-3
Early online date23 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

asylum seeker
threat
guilt
sympathy
Group
conscience
refugee
well-being

Keywords

  • Schadenfreude
  • asylum seekers
  • national identification
  • cross-cultural
  • threat
  • blame

Cite this

@article{e28ee077b4a1488e91518b95aa2cb158,
title = "Glorifying national identification increases schadenfreude about asylum seekers when they are a threat, not entitled to seek asylum, and blamed for their adversity",
abstract = "The purpose of the current research is to explore how mode of identification (glorification versus attachment) results in either schadenfreude “with a bad conscience” (S-BC) about disadvantaged people, or prosocial emotional responses (sympathy and guilt) towards them through appraisals of entitlement, realistic threat, and blame. These relationships were investigated amongst Australians (N = 213) and Romanians (N = 210) in relation to the treatment of asylum seekers in detention centres in those two countries. Consistent with hypotheses, Australian glorifying identifiers considered asylum seekers to be a threat to well-being and to not be entitled to seek asylum. Asylum seekers were therefore blamed for their situation in detention centres and this enhanced group-based S-BC. Very different findings were observed for attached identifiers who expressed group-based sympathy and guilt towards asylum seekers. Similar pathways were observed in the Romanian sample except for the role of entitlement. Moreover, S-BC and related constructs were relatively strong in the Australian sample. The findings are important because they point to the foundations of group-based S-BC. Findings are discussed in relation to the current scale of the global refugee crisis.",
keywords = "Schadenfreude, asylum seekers, national identification, cross-cultural, threat, blame",
author = "Mari{\"e}tte Berndsen and Thomas, {Emma F.} and Craig McGarty and Ana-Maria Bliuc and {Muntele Hendres}, Daniela",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/23743603.2017.1360573",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "166--198",
journal = "Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology",
issn = "2374-3603",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2-3",

}

Glorifying national identification increases schadenfreude about asylum seekers when they are a threat, not entitled to seek asylum, and blamed for their adversity. / Berndsen, Mariëtte (Lead / Corresponding author); Thomas, Emma F.; McGarty, Craig; Bliuc, Ana-Maria; Muntele Hendres, Daniela .

In: Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology , Vol. 2, No. 2-3, 2017, p. 166-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glorifying national identification increases schadenfreude about asylum seekers when they are a threat, not entitled to seek asylum, and blamed for their adversity

AU - Berndsen, Mariëtte

AU - Thomas, Emma F.

AU - McGarty, Craig

AU - Bliuc, Ana-Maria

AU - Muntele Hendres, Daniela

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The purpose of the current research is to explore how mode of identification (glorification versus attachment) results in either schadenfreude “with a bad conscience” (S-BC) about disadvantaged people, or prosocial emotional responses (sympathy and guilt) towards them through appraisals of entitlement, realistic threat, and blame. These relationships were investigated amongst Australians (N = 213) and Romanians (N = 210) in relation to the treatment of asylum seekers in detention centres in those two countries. Consistent with hypotheses, Australian glorifying identifiers considered asylum seekers to be a threat to well-being and to not be entitled to seek asylum. Asylum seekers were therefore blamed for their situation in detention centres and this enhanced group-based S-BC. Very different findings were observed for attached identifiers who expressed group-based sympathy and guilt towards asylum seekers. Similar pathways were observed in the Romanian sample except for the role of entitlement. Moreover, S-BC and related constructs were relatively strong in the Australian sample. The findings are important because they point to the foundations of group-based S-BC. Findings are discussed in relation to the current scale of the global refugee crisis.

AB - The purpose of the current research is to explore how mode of identification (glorification versus attachment) results in either schadenfreude “with a bad conscience” (S-BC) about disadvantaged people, or prosocial emotional responses (sympathy and guilt) towards them through appraisals of entitlement, realistic threat, and blame. These relationships were investigated amongst Australians (N = 213) and Romanians (N = 210) in relation to the treatment of asylum seekers in detention centres in those two countries. Consistent with hypotheses, Australian glorifying identifiers considered asylum seekers to be a threat to well-being and to not be entitled to seek asylum. Asylum seekers were therefore blamed for their situation in detention centres and this enhanced group-based S-BC. Very different findings were observed for attached identifiers who expressed group-based sympathy and guilt towards asylum seekers. Similar pathways were observed in the Romanian sample except for the role of entitlement. Moreover, S-BC and related constructs were relatively strong in the Australian sample. The findings are important because they point to the foundations of group-based S-BC. Findings are discussed in relation to the current scale of the global refugee crisis.

KW - Schadenfreude

KW - asylum seekers

KW - national identification

KW - cross-cultural

KW - threat

KW - blame

U2 - 10.1080/23743603.2017.1360573

DO - 10.1080/23743603.2017.1360573

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 166

EP - 198

JO - Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology

JF - Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology

SN - 2374-3603

IS - 2-3

ER -