Going green vs going smart for sustainable development: Quo vadis?

Paola Gazzola (Lead / Corresponding author), Ainhoa Gonzalez Del Campo, Vincent Onyango

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To date, sustainable development has been the most important discourse informing planning, a powerful rhetoric for solving environmental problems that shows confidence in human ingenuity and technological advancements. However, recent advances in information and communication technologies, are prompting the development of smart(er) approaches to (sustainable) development, which might be signifying a departure from the more traditional, or perhaps earlier, greener narratives underpinning sustainable development. Within this context and informed by analysis of the literature, this paper aims to reflect on the extent to which ideas of going green and going smart are converging or diverging from the path towards sustainable development. This is done using convergence theory and Bennet's typology (1991) of similarities as an analytical framework. The findings suggest that the convergence of greening and smart ideas for sustainable development might be better achieved if smart-centric approaches to policy- and planning are subsumed in the overarching vision of environmental quality and resilience, with green approaches to urban development setting the path and driving decisions towards a sustainable future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)881-892
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume214
Early online date4 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
sustainable development
Planning
information and communication technology
analytical framework
typology
environmental quality
urban development
Communication
planning

Keywords

  • Going green
  • Going smart
  • Sustainable development
  • Ecological modernisation
  • Convergence Divergence

Cite this

Gazzola, Paola ; Del Campo, Ainhoa Gonzalez ; Onyango, Vincent. / Going green vs going smart for sustainable development : Quo vadis?. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019 ; Vol. 214. pp. 881-892.
@article{c832d457bdf94358a2aeccdb0934c43c,
title = "Going green vs going smart for sustainable development: Quo vadis?",
abstract = "To date, sustainable development has been the most important discourse informing planning, a powerful rhetoric for solving environmental problems that shows confidence in human ingenuity and technological advancements. However, recent advances in information and communication technologies, are prompting the development of smart(er) approaches to (sustainable) development, which might be signifying a departure from the more traditional, or perhaps earlier, greener narratives underpinning sustainable development. Within this context and informed by analysis of the literature, this paper aims to reflect on the extent to which ideas of going green and going smart are converging or diverging from the path towards sustainable development. This is done using convergence theory and Bennet's typology (1991) of similarities as an analytical framework. The findings suggest that the convergence of greening and smart ideas for sustainable development might be better achieved if smart-centric approaches to policy- and planning are subsumed in the overarching vision of environmental quality and resilience, with green approaches to urban development setting the path and driving decisions towards a sustainable future.",
keywords = "Going green, Going smart, Sustainable development, Ecological modernisation, Convergence Divergence",
author = "Paola Gazzola and {Del Campo}, {Ainhoa Gonzalez} and Vincent Onyango",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.234",
language = "English",
volume = "214",
pages = "881--892",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Going green vs going smart for sustainable development : Quo vadis? / Gazzola, Paola (Lead / Corresponding author); Del Campo, Ainhoa Gonzalez; Onyango, Vincent.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 214, 20.03.2019, p. 881-892.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Going green vs going smart for sustainable development

T2 - Quo vadis?

AU - Gazzola, Paola

AU - Del Campo, Ainhoa Gonzalez

AU - Onyango, Vincent

PY - 2019/3/20

Y1 - 2019/3/20

N2 - To date, sustainable development has been the most important discourse informing planning, a powerful rhetoric for solving environmental problems that shows confidence in human ingenuity and technological advancements. However, recent advances in information and communication technologies, are prompting the development of smart(er) approaches to (sustainable) development, which might be signifying a departure from the more traditional, or perhaps earlier, greener narratives underpinning sustainable development. Within this context and informed by analysis of the literature, this paper aims to reflect on the extent to which ideas of going green and going smart are converging or diverging from the path towards sustainable development. This is done using convergence theory and Bennet's typology (1991) of similarities as an analytical framework. The findings suggest that the convergence of greening and smart ideas for sustainable development might be better achieved if smart-centric approaches to policy- and planning are subsumed in the overarching vision of environmental quality and resilience, with green approaches to urban development setting the path and driving decisions towards a sustainable future.

AB - To date, sustainable development has been the most important discourse informing planning, a powerful rhetoric for solving environmental problems that shows confidence in human ingenuity and technological advancements. However, recent advances in information and communication technologies, are prompting the development of smart(er) approaches to (sustainable) development, which might be signifying a departure from the more traditional, or perhaps earlier, greener narratives underpinning sustainable development. Within this context and informed by analysis of the literature, this paper aims to reflect on the extent to which ideas of going green and going smart are converging or diverging from the path towards sustainable development. This is done using convergence theory and Bennet's typology (1991) of similarities as an analytical framework. The findings suggest that the convergence of greening and smart ideas for sustainable development might be better achieved if smart-centric approaches to policy- and planning are subsumed in the overarching vision of environmental quality and resilience, with green approaches to urban development setting the path and driving decisions towards a sustainable future.

KW - Going green

KW - Going smart

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Ecological modernisation

KW - Convergence Divergence

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.234

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.234

M3 - Review article

VL - 214

SP - 881

EP - 892

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -