Google, online search and consumer confusion in Australia

Amanda Scardamaglia (Lead / Corresponding author), Angela Daly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


The legality of the operation of Google's search engine, and its liability as an Internet intermediary, has been tested in various jurisdictions on various grounds. In Australia, there was an ultimately unsuccessful case against Google under the 'Australian Consumer Law' relating to how it presents results from its search engine. Despite this failed claim, several complex issues were not adequately addressed in the case including whether Google sufficiently distinguishes between the different parts of its search results page, so as not to mislead or deceive consumers. This article seeks to address this question of consumer confusion by drawing on empirical survey evidence of Australian consumers' understanding of Google's search results layout. This evidence, the first of its kind in Australia, indicates some level of consumer confusion. The implications for future legal proceedings against Google in Australia and in other jurisdictions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbereaw004
Pages (from-to)203-228
Number of pages26
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2016


  • Consumer confusion
  • Cyberlaw
  • Empirical evidence
  • Google
  • Intermediary liability
  • Trade marks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Google, online search and consumer confusion in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this