Grading the graded care profile

Robin Sen; Pam Green Lister; Paul Rigby; Andrew Kendrick

doi:10.1002/car.2257

Grading the graded care profile

Robin Sen (Lead / Corresponding author), Pam Green Lister, Paul Rigby, Andrew Kendrick

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents some of the key findings of a study investigating the introduction of the Graded Care Profile (GCP) - a tool used in the assessment of child neglect - in one Scottish local authority where neglect is the primary reason for which nearly half of all children are placed on the Child Protection Register. The findings suggest that while there are some advantages to the use of the GCP there are also a number of significant questions about previous claims made about its objectivity and value-neutrality, its user-friendliness and its ability to generate good partnership working with parents, particularly where there are substantive disagreements about the quality of care.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	361-373
Number of pages	13
Journal	Child Abuse Review
Volume	23
Issue number	5
Early online date	27 Feb 2013
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2257
Publication status	Published - Sept 2014

Keywords

Assessment
Child neglect
Parental engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Law

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1002/car.2257

Cite this

@article{a59265c321c24c3fb8c43ac6ccfb6e19,

title = "Grading the graded care profile",

abstract = "This paper presents some of the key findings of a study investigating the introduction of the Graded Care Profile (GCP) - a tool used in the assessment of child neglect - in one Scottish local authority where neglect is the primary reason for which nearly half of all children are placed on the Child Protection Register. The findings suggest that while there are some advantages to the use of the GCP there are also a number of significant questions about previous claims made about its objectivity and value-neutrality, its user-friendliness and its ability to generate good partnership working with parents, particularly where there are substantive disagreements about the quality of care.",

keywords = "Assessment, Child neglect, Parental engagement",

author = "Robin Sen and Lister, {Pam Green} and Paul Rigby and Andrew Kendrick",

year = "2014",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1002/car.2257",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "361--373",

journal = "Child Abuse Review",

issn = "0952-9136",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grading the graded care profile

AU - Sen, Robin

AU - Lister, Pam Green

AU - Rigby, Paul

AU - Kendrick, Andrew

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - This paper presents some of the key findings of a study investigating the introduction of the Graded Care Profile (GCP) - a tool used in the assessment of child neglect - in one Scottish local authority where neglect is the primary reason for which nearly half of all children are placed on the Child Protection Register. The findings suggest that while there are some advantages to the use of the GCP there are also a number of significant questions about previous claims made about its objectivity and value-neutrality, its user-friendliness and its ability to generate good partnership working with parents, particularly where there are substantive disagreements about the quality of care.

AB - This paper presents some of the key findings of a study investigating the introduction of the Graded Care Profile (GCP) - a tool used in the assessment of child neglect - in one Scottish local authority where neglect is the primary reason for which nearly half of all children are placed on the Child Protection Register. The findings suggest that while there are some advantages to the use of the GCP there are also a number of significant questions about previous claims made about its objectivity and value-neutrality, its user-friendliness and its ability to generate good partnership working with parents, particularly where there are substantive disagreements about the quality of care.

KW - Assessment

KW - Child neglect

KW - Parental engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911096053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/car.2257

DO - 10.1002/car.2257

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84911096053

SN - 0952-9136

VL - 23

SP - 361

EP - 373

JO - Child Abuse Review

JF - Child Abuse Review

IS - 5

ER -

Grading the graded care profile

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this