Heart failure with improved versus persistently reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A comparison of the BIOSTAT-CHF (European) study with the ASIAN-HF registry

Thong Huy Cao (Lead / Corresponding author), Wan Ting Tay, Donald J. l. Jones, John G. F. Cleland, Jasper Tromp, Johanna Elisabeth Emmens, Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng, Chanchal Chandramouli, Oliver Charles Slingsby, Stefan D. Anker, Kenneth Dickstein, Gerasimos Filippatos, Chim Lang, Marco Metra, Piotr Ponikowski, Nilesh J. Samani, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Faiez Zannad, Inder Anand, Carolyn S. P. LamAdriaan A. Voors, Leong L. Ng (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims
We investigated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).

Methods and results
We used data from BIOSTAT-CHF including patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% at baseline who had LVEF re-assessed at 9 months. HFimpEF was defined as a LVEF >40% and a LVEF ≥10% increase from baseline at 9 months. We validated findings in the ASIAN-HF registry. The primary outcome was a composite of time to HF rehospitalization or all-cause mortality. In BIOSTAT-CHF, about 20% of patients developed HFimpEF, that was associated with a lower primary event rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.97, p = 0.040) and the composite endpoint (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.70, p < 0.001) compared with patients who remained in persistent HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The findings were similar in the ASIAN-HF (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18–0.89, p = 0.024, and HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17–0.48, p < 0.001). Five independently common predictors for HFimpEF in both BIOSTAT-CHF and ASIAN-HF were female sex, absence of ischaemic heart disease, higher LVEF, smaller left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter at baseline. A predictive model combining only five predictors (absence of ischaemic heart disease and left bundle branch block, smaller left ventricular end-systolic and left atrial diameter, and higher platelet count) for HFimpEF in the BIOSTAT-CHF achieved an area under the curve of 0.772 and 0.688 in the ASIAN-HF (due to missing left atrial diameter and platelet count).

Conclusions
Approximately 20–30% of patients with HFrEF improved to HFimpEF within 1 year with better clinical outcomes. In addition, the predictive model with clinical predictors could more accurately predict HFimpEF in patients with HFrEF.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Early online date9 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • clinical outcome
  • heart failure
  • heart failure with improved ejection fraction
  • left ventricular ejection fraction
  • heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
  • predicator
  • predictive model
  • Heart failure
  • Predictor
  • Heart failure with improved ejection fraction
  • Predictive model
  • Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
  • Clinical outcome
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heart failure with improved versus persistently reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A comparison of the BIOSTAT-CHF (European) study with the ASIAN-HF registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this