Hegemonic Influence and Selectivity in Financial Accountability Discharge: Evidence from Ghana’s Oil and Gas Sector

Emmanuel Asare, Bruce Burton (Lead / Corresponding author), Theresa Dunne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper compares the extent of engagement between the Ghanaian government and the nation’s oil and gas firms with the nature of the financial accountability offered by each of these parties to the citizenry. The findings indicate that whilst the Ghanaian government and the nation’s oil firms pay (at best) cursory regard to societal needs for information and engagement, when interacting with each other an effective and unapologetic form of discharge exists, suggesting the existence of an exclusionary hegemony. We mobilize elements of work by Jessop (2003a and 2003b), Joseph (2002 and 2003) and Andrew and Baker (2020) to contextualise the evidence around recent theoretical debates on selectivity in information flows and accountability discharge in developing nation settings.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102762
JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
Volume100
Early online date8 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Ghana
  • Financial Accountability
  • Oil and Gas
  • Natural Resources
  • Hegemony

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hegemonic Influence and Selectivity in Financial Accountability Discharge: Evidence from Ghana’s Oil and Gas Sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this