Abstract
In response to a paper by Blackford et al. (1992) which showed a coincidence between the deposition of Hekla-4 tephra and a decline of Pinus pollen in two northern Scottish sites, Hall et al. (1994) investigated the tephra/pine pollen relationship at two sites in Northern Ireland. We argue that their sites are inappropriate for such comparison because pine was effectively absent from Co. Antrim long before the deposition of Hekla-4. The opportunity is taken to make some additional points concerning the Irish data and the wider use of tephra isochrones.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 495-497 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Holocene |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |
Keywords
- Hekla-4
- Ireland
- Pine decline
- Pinus sylvestris
- Scotland
- Tephra
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Global and Planetary Change
- Archaeology
- Ecology
- Earth-Surface Processes
- Palaeontology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hekla-4 ash, the pine decline in Northern Ireland and the effective use of tephra isochrones: a comment on Hall, Pilcher and McCormac'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver