TY - JOUR
T1 - High-frequency water quality monitoring in an urban catchment
T2 - hydrochemical dynamics, primary production and implications for the Water Framework Directive
AU - Halliday, Sarah J.
AU - Skeffington, Richard A.
AU - Wade, Andrew J.
AU - Bowes, Michael J.
AU - Gozzard, Emma
AU - Newman, Jonathan R.
AU - Loewenthal, Matthew
AU - Palmer-Felgate, Elizabeth J.
AU - Jarvie, Helen P.
N1 - We thank the Natural Environment Research Council(NERC) for funding the analysis of this data under the Turf2Surf Macronutrients Project (NE/J011967/1); the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for funding the LIMPIDS project (EP/G019967/1); NERC for financially supporting the CEH Thames Initiative monitoring; Linda Armstrong, Sarah Harman and Heather Wickham (CEH) for carrying out the laboratory analysis and Colin Roberts (CEH) for the weekly river sampling.
PY - 2015/7/14
Y1 - 2015/7/14
N2 - This paper describes the hydrochemistry of a lowland, urbanised river-system, The Cut in England, using in situ sub-daily sampling. The Cut receives effluent discharges from four major sewage treatment works serving around 190 000 people. These discharges consist largely of treated water, originally abstracted from the River Thames and returned via the water supply network, substantially increasing the natural flow. The hourly water quality data were supplemented by weekly manual sampling with laboratory analysis to check the hourly data and measure further determinands. Mean phosphorus and nitrate concentrations were very high, breaching standards set by EU legislation. Although 56% of the catchment area is agricultural, the hydrochemical dynamics were significantly impacted by effluent discharges which accounted for approximately 50% of the annual P catchment input loads and, on average, 59% of river flow at the monitoring point. Diurnal dissolved oxygen data demonstrated high in-stream productivity. From a comparison of high frequency and conventional monitoring data, it is inferred that much of the primary production was dominated by benthic algae, largely diatoms. Despite the high productivity and nutrient concentrations, the river water did not become anoxic, and major phytoplankton blooms were not observed. The strong diurnal and annual variation observed showed that assessments of water quality made under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) are sensitive to the time and season of sampling. It is recommended that specific sampling time windows be specified for each determinand, and that WFD targets should be applied in combination to help identify periods of greatest ecological risk.
AB - This paper describes the hydrochemistry of a lowland, urbanised river-system, The Cut in England, using in situ sub-daily sampling. The Cut receives effluent discharges from four major sewage treatment works serving around 190 000 people. These discharges consist largely of treated water, originally abstracted from the River Thames and returned via the water supply network, substantially increasing the natural flow. The hourly water quality data were supplemented by weekly manual sampling with laboratory analysis to check the hourly data and measure further determinands. Mean phosphorus and nitrate concentrations were very high, breaching standards set by EU legislation. Although 56% of the catchment area is agricultural, the hydrochemical dynamics were significantly impacted by effluent discharges which accounted for approximately 50% of the annual P catchment input loads and, on average, 59% of river flow at the monitoring point. Diurnal dissolved oxygen data demonstrated high in-stream productivity. From a comparison of high frequency and conventional monitoring data, it is inferred that much of the primary production was dominated by benthic algae, largely diatoms. Despite the high productivity and nutrient concentrations, the river water did not become anoxic, and major phytoplankton blooms were not observed. The strong diurnal and annual variation observed showed that assessments of water quality made under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) are sensitive to the time and season of sampling. It is recommended that specific sampling time windows be specified for each determinand, and that WFD targets should be applied in combination to help identify periods of greatest ecological risk.
KW - diurnal dynamics
KW - instream productivity
KW - phosphorus
KW - sewage treatment works
KW - The Cut
KW - Water Framework Directive
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946228917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hyp.10453
DO - 10.1002/hyp.10453
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84946228917
SN - 0885-6087
VL - 29
SP - 3388
EP - 3407
JO - Hydrological Processes
JF - Hydrological Processes
IS - 15
ER -