Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses

Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper considers the work of two leftist European activists from the 1970s, Mario Mieli and Guy Hocquenghem. It considers their different ideas about nature and biology, focusing on the reasons why their views about the origins of sexuality came to be different. This essay argues that Hocquenghem conflated biology with the oppressive systems that have used it, whereas Mieli is shown to have advocated intellectual engagement with biological discourse, such as animal models. This is important because both authors are considered founders within queer theory, yet Hocquenghem’s ideas are widely known and accepted while Mieli’s are not. The translation history of Mieli’s text suggests that positive views of biology have since been suppressed in mainstream queer theory.
The variety of attitudes to biological metaphor in classical queer theory is underappreciated and uncovering it is significant. New considerations of ‘queer nature’, based on field observations, do not trace their conceptual roots to earlier writings of the sexual revolution. This paper proposes Mieli as a theoretical forebear for those seeking a more positive view towards biology within modern cultural discourse.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-56
Number of pages26
JournalThe Researcher: an Interdisciplinary Journal
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Queer Theory
Nature
Discourse
Early Writings
Activists
Forebears
Queerness
History of Translation
Leftist
Sexual
1970s
Sexuality
Revolution
Animal Model

Keywords

  • Mieli
  • Hocquenghem
  • Foucault
  • essentialism
  • SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
  • biology
  • ECOLOGY
  • homosexuality
  • queer

Cite this

Hartford, J. (2011). Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses: Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory. The Researcher: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 31-56.
Hartford, Jason. / Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses : Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory. In: The Researcher: an Interdisciplinary Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 31-56.
@article{7a8ead8e90f5465a8587f09a0ce96bb1,
title = "Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses: Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory",
abstract = "This paper considers the work of two leftist European activists from the 1970s, Mario Mieli and Guy Hocquenghem. It considers their different ideas about nature and biology, focusing on the reasons why their views about the origins of sexuality came to be different. This essay argues that Hocquenghem conflated biology with the oppressive systems that have used it, whereas Mieli is shown to have advocated intellectual engagement with biological discourse, such as animal models. This is important because both authors are considered founders within queer theory, yet Hocquenghem’s ideas are widely known and accepted while Mieli’s are not. The translation history of Mieli’s text suggests that positive views of biology have since been suppressed in mainstream queer theory. The variety of attitudes to biological metaphor in classical queer theory is underappreciated and uncovering it is significant. New considerations of ‘queer nature’, based on field observations, do not trace their conceptual roots to earlier writings of the sexual revolution. This paper proposes Mieli as a theoretical forebear for those seeking a more positive view towards biology within modern cultural discourse.",
keywords = "Mieli, Hocquenghem, Foucault, essentialism, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION, biology, ECOLOGY, homosexuality, queer",
author = "Jason Hartford",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "31--56",
number = "2",

}

Hartford, J 2011, 'Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses: Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory', The Researcher: an Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 31-56.

Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses : Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory. / Hartford, Jason.

In: The Researcher: an Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2011, p. 31-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses

T2 - Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory

AU - Hartford, Jason

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper considers the work of two leftist European activists from the 1970s, Mario Mieli and Guy Hocquenghem. It considers their different ideas about nature and biology, focusing on the reasons why their views about the origins of sexuality came to be different. This essay argues that Hocquenghem conflated biology with the oppressive systems that have used it, whereas Mieli is shown to have advocated intellectual engagement with biological discourse, such as animal models. This is important because both authors are considered founders within queer theory, yet Hocquenghem’s ideas are widely known and accepted while Mieli’s are not. The translation history of Mieli’s text suggests that positive views of biology have since been suppressed in mainstream queer theory. The variety of attitudes to biological metaphor in classical queer theory is underappreciated and uncovering it is significant. New considerations of ‘queer nature’, based on field observations, do not trace their conceptual roots to earlier writings of the sexual revolution. This paper proposes Mieli as a theoretical forebear for those seeking a more positive view towards biology within modern cultural discourse.

AB - This paper considers the work of two leftist European activists from the 1970s, Mario Mieli and Guy Hocquenghem. It considers their different ideas about nature and biology, focusing on the reasons why their views about the origins of sexuality came to be different. This essay argues that Hocquenghem conflated biology with the oppressive systems that have used it, whereas Mieli is shown to have advocated intellectual engagement with biological discourse, such as animal models. This is important because both authors are considered founders within queer theory, yet Hocquenghem’s ideas are widely known and accepted while Mieli’s are not. The translation history of Mieli’s text suggests that positive views of biology have since been suppressed in mainstream queer theory. The variety of attitudes to biological metaphor in classical queer theory is underappreciated and uncovering it is significant. New considerations of ‘queer nature’, based on field observations, do not trace their conceptual roots to earlier writings of the sexual revolution. This paper proposes Mieli as a theoretical forebear for those seeking a more positive view towards biology within modern cultural discourse.

KW - Mieli

KW - Hocquenghem

KW - Foucault

KW - essentialism

KW - SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION

KW - biology

KW - ECOLOGY

KW - homosexuality

KW - queer

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 31

EP - 56

IS - 2

ER -

Hartford J. Hocquenghem, Mieli and Seahorses: Nature and Biology at the Roots of Queer Theory. The Researcher: an Interdisciplinary Journal. 2011;24(2):31-56.