How does similarity-based interference affect the choice of referring expression?

Kumiko Fukumura, Roger P. G. van Gompel, Trevor Harley, Martin J. Pickering

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We tested a cue-based retrieval model that predicts how similarity between discourse entities influences the speaker's choice of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, speakers produced fewer pronouns (relative to repeated noun phrases) when the competitor was in the same situation as the referent (both on a horse) rather than in a different situation (only the referent on a horse). The situational congruence had a larger impact when it was relevant to the to-be-described action (getting off a horse) than otherwise (taking off a hat), suggesting that the effect of similarity is modulated by its relevance to other conceptual representations held by the speaker. Experiment 2 found an effect of the competitor's similarity regardless of whether pronouns were ambiguous or not, suggesting that the effect is independent of ambiguity avoidance and results from speaker-internal production constraints. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)331-344
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Memory and Language
    Volume65
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

    Keywords

    • Language production
    • Similarity-based interference
    • Discourse
    • Referring expression
    • Anaphor
    • Pronoun
    • SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY
    • LANGUAGE PRODUCTION
    • LEXICAL ACCESS
    • REFERENTIAL DOMAINS
    • AUDIENCE DESIGN
    • WORKING-MEMORY
    • THEMATIC ROLES
    • TIME
    • COMMUNICATION
    • RECOGNITION

    Cite this

    @article{52451e4db94647abb1c7322b7f0a1c1b,
    title = "How does similarity-based interference affect the choice of referring expression?",
    abstract = "We tested a cue-based retrieval model that predicts how similarity between discourse entities influences the speaker's choice of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, speakers produced fewer pronouns (relative to repeated noun phrases) when the competitor was in the same situation as the referent (both on a horse) rather than in a different situation (only the referent on a horse). The situational congruence had a larger impact when it was relevant to the to-be-described action (getting off a horse) than otherwise (taking off a hat), suggesting that the effect of similarity is modulated by its relevance to other conceptual representations held by the speaker. Experiment 2 found an effect of the competitor's similarity regardless of whether pronouns were ambiguous or not, suggesting that the effect is independent of ambiguity avoidance and results from speaker-internal production constraints. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
    keywords = "Language production, Similarity-based interference, Discourse, Referring expression, Anaphor, Pronoun, SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY, LANGUAGE PRODUCTION, LEXICAL ACCESS, REFERENTIAL DOMAINS, AUDIENCE DESIGN, WORKING-MEMORY, THEMATIC ROLES, TIME, COMMUNICATION, RECOGNITION",
    author = "Kumiko Fukumura and {van Gompel}, {Roger P. G.} and Trevor Harley and Pickering, {Martin J.}",
    year = "2011",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "65",
    pages = "331--344",
    journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
    issn = "0749-596X",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "3",

    }

    How does similarity-based interference affect the choice of referring expression? / Fukumura, Kumiko; van Gompel, Roger P. G.; Harley, Trevor; Pickering, Martin J.

    In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 65, No. 3, 10.2011, p. 331-344.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How does similarity-based interference affect the choice of referring expression?

    AU - Fukumura, Kumiko

    AU - van Gompel, Roger P. G.

    AU - Harley, Trevor

    AU - Pickering, Martin J.

    PY - 2011/10

    Y1 - 2011/10

    N2 - We tested a cue-based retrieval model that predicts how similarity between discourse entities influences the speaker's choice of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, speakers produced fewer pronouns (relative to repeated noun phrases) when the competitor was in the same situation as the referent (both on a horse) rather than in a different situation (only the referent on a horse). The situational congruence had a larger impact when it was relevant to the to-be-described action (getting off a horse) than otherwise (taking off a hat), suggesting that the effect of similarity is modulated by its relevance to other conceptual representations held by the speaker. Experiment 2 found an effect of the competitor's similarity regardless of whether pronouns were ambiguous or not, suggesting that the effect is independent of ambiguity avoidance and results from speaker-internal production constraints. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    AB - We tested a cue-based retrieval model that predicts how similarity between discourse entities influences the speaker's choice of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, speakers produced fewer pronouns (relative to repeated noun phrases) when the competitor was in the same situation as the referent (both on a horse) rather than in a different situation (only the referent on a horse). The situational congruence had a larger impact when it was relevant to the to-be-described action (getting off a horse) than otherwise (taking off a hat), suggesting that the effect of similarity is modulated by its relevance to other conceptual representations held by the speaker. Experiment 2 found an effect of the competitor's similarity regardless of whether pronouns were ambiguous or not, suggesting that the effect is independent of ambiguity avoidance and results from speaker-internal production constraints. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    KW - Language production

    KW - Similarity-based interference

    KW - Discourse

    KW - Referring expression

    KW - Anaphor

    KW - Pronoun

    KW - SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY

    KW - LANGUAGE PRODUCTION

    KW - LEXICAL ACCESS

    KW - REFERENTIAL DOMAINS

    KW - AUDIENCE DESIGN

    KW - WORKING-MEMORY

    KW - THEMATIC ROLES

    KW - TIME

    KW - COMMUNICATION

    KW - RECOGNITION

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052035352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 65

    SP - 331

    EP - 344

    JO - Journal of Memory and Language

    JF - Journal of Memory and Language

    SN - 0749-596X

    IS - 3

    ER -