How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis

Leonardo Terranova, Martina Oriano, Antonio Teri, Luca Ruggiero, Camilla Tafuro, Paola Marchisio, Andrea Gramegna, Martina Contarini, Elisa Franceschi, Samantha Sottotetti, Lisa Cariani, Annamaria Bevivino, James D. Chalmers, Stefano Aliberti (Lead / Corresponding author), Francesco Blasi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Different steps and conditions for DNA extraction for microbiota analysis in sputum have been reported in the literature. We aimed at testing both dithiothreitol (DTT) and enzymatic treatments of sputum samples and identifying the most suitable DNA extraction technique for the microbiota analysis of sputum. Sputum treatments with and without DTT were compared in terms of their median levels and the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene. Treatments with and without lysozyme and lysostaphin were compared in terms of their median levels of real-time PCR for S. aureus. Two enzyme-based and three beads-based techniques for DNA extraction were compared in terms of their DNA extraction yield, real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene and microbiota analysis. DTT treatment decreased the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR. Lysostaphin (either 0.18 or 0.36 mg/mL) and lysozyme treatments increased S. aureus detection. One enzyme-based kit offered the highest DNA yield and 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR with no significant differences in terms of alpha-diversity indexes. A condition using both DTT and lysostaphin/lysozyme treatments along with an enzymatic kit seems to be preferred for the microbiota analysis of sputum samples.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3256
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Bacterial DNA
Microbiota
Sputum
DNA
deoxyribonucleic acid
Lysostaphin
Dithiothreitol
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Enzymes
lysozyme
Muramidase
rRNA Genes
genes
kits
Genes
enzymes
coefficients
beads
Testing

Keywords

  • DNA extraction
  • sputum
  • microbiota
  • sequencing

Cite this

Terranova, L., Oriano, M., Teri, A., Ruggiero, L., Tafuro, C., Marchisio, P., ... Blasi, F. (2018). How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(10), 1-12. [3256]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103256
Terranova, Leonardo ; Oriano, Martina ; Teri, Antonio ; Ruggiero, Luca ; Tafuro, Camilla ; Marchisio, Paola ; Gramegna, Andrea ; Contarini, Martina ; Franceschi, Elisa ; Sottotetti, Samantha ; Cariani, Lisa ; Bevivino, Annamaria ; Chalmers, James D. ; Aliberti, Stefano ; Blasi, Francesco. / How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis. In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. 10. pp. 1-12.
@article{a30baef385b7419096f129980d56a135,
title = "How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis",
abstract = "Different steps and conditions for DNA extraction for microbiota analysis in sputum have been reported in the literature. We aimed at testing both dithiothreitol (DTT) and enzymatic treatments of sputum samples and identifying the most suitable DNA extraction technique for the microbiota analysis of sputum. Sputum treatments with and without DTT were compared in terms of their median levels and the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene. Treatments with and without lysozyme and lysostaphin were compared in terms of their median levels of real-time PCR for S. aureus. Two enzyme-based and three beads-based techniques for DNA extraction were compared in terms of their DNA extraction yield, real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene and microbiota analysis. DTT treatment decreased the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR. Lysostaphin (either 0.18 or 0.36 mg/mL) and lysozyme treatments increased S. aureus detection. One enzyme-based kit offered the highest DNA yield and 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR with no significant differences in terms of alpha-diversity indexes. A condition using both DTT and lysostaphin/lysozyme treatments along with an enzymatic kit seems to be preferred for the microbiota analysis of sputum samples.",
keywords = "DNA extraction, sputum, microbiota, sequencing",
author = "Leonardo Terranova and Martina Oriano and Antonio Teri and Luca Ruggiero and Camilla Tafuro and Paola Marchisio and Andrea Gramegna and Martina Contarini and Elisa Franceschi and Samantha Sottotetti and Lisa Cariani and Annamaria Bevivino and Chalmers, {James D.} and Stefano Aliberti and Francesco Blasi",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3390/ijms19103256",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "International Journal of Molecular Sciences",
issn = "1661-6596",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "10",

}

Terranova, L, Oriano, M, Teri, A, Ruggiero, L, Tafuro, C, Marchisio, P, Gramegna, A, Contarini, M, Franceschi, E, Sottotetti, S, Cariani, L, Bevivino, A, Chalmers, JD, Aliberti, S & Blasi, F 2018, 'How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis', International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 10, 3256, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103256

How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis. / Terranova, Leonardo; Oriano, Martina; Teri, Antonio; Ruggiero, Luca; Tafuro, Camilla; Marchisio, Paola; Gramegna, Andrea; Contarini, Martina; Franceschi, Elisa; Sottotetti, Samantha; Cariani, Lisa; Bevivino, Annamaria; Chalmers, James D.; Aliberti, Stefano (Lead / Corresponding author); Blasi, Francesco.

In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 10, 3256, 20.10.2018, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis

AU - Terranova, Leonardo

AU - Oriano, Martina

AU - Teri, Antonio

AU - Ruggiero, Luca

AU - Tafuro, Camilla

AU - Marchisio, Paola

AU - Gramegna, Andrea

AU - Contarini, Martina

AU - Franceschi, Elisa

AU - Sottotetti, Samantha

AU - Cariani, Lisa

AU - Bevivino, Annamaria

AU - Chalmers, James D.

AU - Aliberti, Stefano

AU - Blasi, Francesco

PY - 2018/10/20

Y1 - 2018/10/20

N2 - Different steps and conditions for DNA extraction for microbiota analysis in sputum have been reported in the literature. We aimed at testing both dithiothreitol (DTT) and enzymatic treatments of sputum samples and identifying the most suitable DNA extraction technique for the microbiota analysis of sputum. Sputum treatments with and without DTT were compared in terms of their median levels and the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene. Treatments with and without lysozyme and lysostaphin were compared in terms of their median levels of real-time PCR for S. aureus. Two enzyme-based and three beads-based techniques for DNA extraction were compared in terms of their DNA extraction yield, real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene and microbiota analysis. DTT treatment decreased the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR. Lysostaphin (either 0.18 or 0.36 mg/mL) and lysozyme treatments increased S. aureus detection. One enzyme-based kit offered the highest DNA yield and 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR with no significant differences in terms of alpha-diversity indexes. A condition using both DTT and lysostaphin/lysozyme treatments along with an enzymatic kit seems to be preferred for the microbiota analysis of sputum samples.

AB - Different steps and conditions for DNA extraction for microbiota analysis in sputum have been reported in the literature. We aimed at testing both dithiothreitol (DTT) and enzymatic treatments of sputum samples and identifying the most suitable DNA extraction technique for the microbiota analysis of sputum. Sputum treatments with and without DTT were compared in terms of their median levels and the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene. Treatments with and without lysozyme and lysostaphin were compared in terms of their median levels of real-time PCR for S. aureus. Two enzyme-based and three beads-based techniques for DNA extraction were compared in terms of their DNA extraction yield, real-time PCR for the 16S rRNA gene and microbiota analysis. DTT treatment decreased the coefficient of variation between replicates of both DNA extraction yield and real-time PCR. Lysostaphin (either 0.18 or 0.36 mg/mL) and lysozyme treatments increased S. aureus detection. One enzyme-based kit offered the highest DNA yield and 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR with no significant differences in terms of alpha-diversity indexes. A condition using both DTT and lysostaphin/lysozyme treatments along with an enzymatic kit seems to be preferred for the microbiota analysis of sputum samples.

KW - DNA extraction

KW - sputum

KW - microbiota

KW - sequencing

U2 - 10.3390/ijms19103256

DO - 10.3390/ijms19103256

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences

JF - International Journal of Molecular Sciences

SN - 1661-6596

IS - 10

M1 - 3256

ER -

Terranova L, Oriano M, Teri A, Ruggiero L, Tafuro C, Marchisio P et al. How to Process Sputum Samples and Extract Bacterial DNA for Microbiota Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018 Oct 20;19(10):1-12. 3256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103256