‘I went with what I always do…’: a qualitative analysis of ‘Cleggmania’ and vote choice in the 2010 British General Election

Edzia Carvalho (Lead / Corresponding author), Kristi Winters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

166 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We use focus group transcripts from the innovative Qualitative Election Study of Britain dataset to provide insights into why ‘Cleggmania’ failed to translate into electoral success for the Liberal Democrats in 2010. Analyses conducted on participants’ vote choice stories indicate the effect of ‘Cleggmania’ was limited to strengthening the resolve of wavering Liberal Democrats. Long-time Labour and Conservative supporters who leaned Liberal Democrat before the election found their latent party identification made voting for a different party psychologically uncomfortable. Qualitative electoral research can advance our understanding of people’s voting calculus by analysing narratives for values, identity, utility maximizing, and constituency dynamics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-446
Number of pages24
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume68
Issue number2
Early online date12 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

voting
voter
election
election research
labor
narrative
Values
Group
time

Cite this

@article{d9afb4e600604ab992c228efdafc6c05,
title = "‘I went with what I always do…’: a qualitative analysis of ‘Cleggmania’ and vote choice in the 2010 British General Election",
abstract = "We use focus group transcripts from the innovative Qualitative Election Study of Britain dataset to provide insights into why ‘Cleggmania’ failed to translate into electoral success for the Liberal Democrats in 2010. Analyses conducted on participants’ vote choice stories indicate the effect of ‘Cleggmania’ was limited to strengthening the resolve of wavering Liberal Democrats. Long-time Labour and Conservative supporters who leaned Liberal Democrat before the election found their latent party identification made voting for a different party psychologically uncomfortable. Qualitative electoral research can advance our understanding of people’s voting calculus by analysing narratives for values, identity, utility maximizing, and constituency dynamics.",
author = "Edzia Carvalho and Kristi Winters",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1093/pa/gst050",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "423--446",
journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",
issn = "0031-2290",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘I went with what I always do…’

T2 - a qualitative analysis of ‘Cleggmania’ and vote choice in the 2010 British General Election

AU - Carvalho, Edzia

AU - Winters, Kristi

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - We use focus group transcripts from the innovative Qualitative Election Study of Britain dataset to provide insights into why ‘Cleggmania’ failed to translate into electoral success for the Liberal Democrats in 2010. Analyses conducted on participants’ vote choice stories indicate the effect of ‘Cleggmania’ was limited to strengthening the resolve of wavering Liberal Democrats. Long-time Labour and Conservative supporters who leaned Liberal Democrat before the election found their latent party identification made voting for a different party psychologically uncomfortable. Qualitative electoral research can advance our understanding of people’s voting calculus by analysing narratives for values, identity, utility maximizing, and constituency dynamics.

AB - We use focus group transcripts from the innovative Qualitative Election Study of Britain dataset to provide insights into why ‘Cleggmania’ failed to translate into electoral success for the Liberal Democrats in 2010. Analyses conducted on participants’ vote choice stories indicate the effect of ‘Cleggmania’ was limited to strengthening the resolve of wavering Liberal Democrats. Long-time Labour and Conservative supporters who leaned Liberal Democrat before the election found their latent party identification made voting for a different party psychologically uncomfortable. Qualitative electoral research can advance our understanding of people’s voting calculus by analysing narratives for values, identity, utility maximizing, and constituency dynamics.

U2 - 10.1093/pa/gst050

DO - 10.1093/pa/gst050

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 423

EP - 446

JO - Parliamentary Affairs

JF - Parliamentary Affairs

SN - 0031-2290

IS - 2

ER -